Categories
Podcast episode

AI in Finance: Empowering Investors with Real-time Market Insights w/ Andrew Einhorn, LevelFields – EP229

Andrew Einhorn from LevelFields shares insights into leveraging AI for financial market analysis. Their innovative platform is designed to detect key events affecting stock prices, enabling investors to react swiftly. The conversation covers the benefits of AI in democratizing financial information and the future implications for investment strategies. Disclaimer: Nothing in this episode should be considered financial or investment advice. Our aim is to provide information and insights to help you understand the evolving landscape of AI and investing. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Please get in touch with us with any questions, comments and suggestions by emailing us at contact@economicsexplored.com or sending a voice message via https://www.speakpipe.com/economicsexplored

You can listen to the episode via the embedded player below or via podcasting apps including Google PodcastsApple Podcast and Spotify.

About this episode’s guest Andrew Einhorn

Andrew Einhorn is the visionary CEO and co-founder behind Level Fields, a groundbreaking company leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to revolutionize the way investors interact with the stock market. With a career deeply rooted in technology and finance, Einhorn has dedicated himself to democratizing access to advanced investment strategies, making it possible for the average investor to make informed decisions swiftly and with confidence. Before establishing Level Fields, Einhorn led a successful event monitoring system company for a decade, serving publicly traded companies and offering insights into how market events affect stock prices. His passion for utilizing technology to enhance market transparency and fairness has led to the creation of Level Fields’ AI-driven platform, designed to scan the market for events impacting stock prices, thereby leveling the playing field between retail investors and the larger, more resource-rich players in the market.

What’s covered in EP229

  • Introduction. (0:00)
  • Using AI to analyze financial news and announcements. (2:47)
  • Using AI for stock market analysis and avoiding fraudulent companies. (7:19)
  • AI applications and their limitations. (13:38)
  • Using AI to analyze market data for investment insights. (18:24)
  • AI-powered stock market analysis. (23:26)
  • AI-powered investment research platform for retail investors. (28:01)
  • Using AI to analyze audio transcripts for investment insights. (33:12)
  • Using AI for event monitoring and investment analysis. (38:45)
  • Using historical data for investment strategies. (44:10)
  • AI’s role in investing and the financial establishment’s reaction. (49:19)

Takeaways

1. AI can help democratize access to investment strategies by scanning vast amounts of market data and financial reports that individual investors cannot monitor themselves.

2. Understanding how historical events have impacted stock prices can provide insights on predicting future price movements and avoiding losses from overreacting to news.

3. While AI is not a crystal ball, it can be a useful tool for investors when combined with human judgment, by automating tedious research tasks and identifying potential opportunities that may otherwise be missed.

Links relevant to the conversation

LevelFields website: https://www.levelfields.ai/ 

Andrew’s interview on the Side Hustle City podcast: https://www.sidehustle.money/1350142/14348901-revolutionizing-investing-andrew-einhorn-unveils-levelfields-the-game-changing-tool-in-stock-market-analysis 

Transcript: Revisiting Ricardo: The Rise and Fall of Ricardian Equivalence

N.B. This is a lightly edited version of a transcript originally created using the AI application otter.ai. It may not be 100 percent accurate, but should be pretty close. If you’d like to quote from it, please check the quoted segment in the recording.

Andrew Einhorn  00:04

Just like any new tech in the market, you’re going to piss off some people. And, you know, we’re trying to give some of these strategies to the general population and democratise access and everyone likes that.

Gene Tunny  00:26

Welcome to the economics explored podcast, a frank and fearless exploration of important economic issues. I’m your host gene Tunny. I’m a professional economist and former Australian Treasury official. The aim of this show is to help you better understand the big economic issues affecting all our lives. We do this by considering the theory evidence and by hearing a wide range of views. I’m delighted that you can join me for this episode, please check out the show notes for relevant information. Now on to the show. Hello, thanks for tuning in to the show. Today we’re exploring an exhilarating intersection, AI and investing. In this episode, we’re joined by Andrew einhorn the CEO and co founder of level fields, a company that’s at the forefront of applying AI in financial markets. Andrew and his team have developed a platform that scans the market for events proven to impact stock prices, allowing investors to make more informed decisions rapidly. For Andrew is not just about speed, it’s about levelling the playing field between the average investor and the big players in the market. As always, I’m interested to hear what you think about the issues we discuss on this show. So please get in touch and share your thoughts. You can find my contact details in the show notes. Before we proceed, I need to make a quick disclaimer. Nothing in this episode should be interpreted as financial advice specific to you. Our aim is to provide information and insights to help you understand the evolving landscape of AI and investing. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. Right? Oh, we’d better get into it. I hope you enjoy my conversation with Andrew einhorn from level fields. Andrew einhorn from level fields, welcome to the programme.

Andrew Einhorn  02:15

Thanks, Gene happy to be here. Appreciate you having me on.

Gene Tunny  02:18

Excellent. You’re doing some very interesting things in AI and in applying AI to financial markets that I’m delighted to have you on the show to talk about so your company is level fields and the pitch is find better investments 1800 times faster. Ai scans for events proven to impact stock prices. So you don’t have to. Okay, so can you explain I mean, what are you actually doing there? Andrew? What’s this? What’s this AI? What’s it scanning? Can you please talk to us about that place?

Andrew Einhorn  03:01

Your Yeah, happy to, at a very, very basic level. It’s monitoring the market for events that are proven to move share prices, either north or south, and positively or negatively. If you know how a price is going to move, and you’ll learn about the event happening, then you can anticipate that move. And you can make short, mid or long term bets trades knowledge and information, you know, concrete piece of it would be you know, if the CEO departs from a large corporation like an Amazon, we have a data analytic system that shows that usually results for companies like Amazon in a price decrease of a couple percentage points, you know, what’s happened with Amazon. But the data also shows that within about three months, the stock is right back where it used to be in many cases, far above it. And we can see the different types of stocks, you know, smaller stocks versus bigger ones, profitable or unprofitable companies, they all react a little bit differently. If you take an unprofitable, struggling company, and the CEO leaves, the share price often goes up. People are celebrating that, hey, you know, hope is coming. Let’s bring somebody else in. And so the data set shows that and it alerts people of these kinds of opportunities, which happen in some cases 100 times a day, across 1000s of stocks that are in the market. And so we track all types of events, leadership changes, capital deployments, you know, being added to indexes. Investors coming in large billionaires coming in and buying positions and companies pushing for changes. We have lots of different event types and the ideas, you can just quickly find what’s going on in the market without actually reading very much, because the AI is out there reading all these company announcements, all the reports, they’re putting out the news that’s covering them. And just in the US alone, that amounts to about 6300. Companies, all making announcements constantly. And we get a large part of our information directly from those companies. But the reports can be long, it can be boring, and they can be tedious for somebody to read, even if they have the time to read the reports of 6300 companies, which is physically impossible. Unless you have a couple 100 analysts covering all the stocks, you’re never going to be able to do it as an individual. As a result, there’s a natural discrepancy in the market, where an average investor doesn’t have the resources or the time or even the knowledge sometimes to find out about all these events, to know what’s going on in the marketplace. So they’re constantly at a disadvantage to large hedge funds and asset management shops that do have the resources to scan the entire market to deploy capital. And if you want to test that theory, just ask an average person to name as many stocks as they can. I think you’re gonna stump people around the 20 to 30. Mark, everybody can name the seven, The Magnificent Seven, right? After that, they’ll start to slow down. Even very good seasoned investors will have a tough time after that. And as the reason is that, a lot of the media is biassed towards those mega cap companies, covering them all the time, making you aware of them all the time, because you click on it. And they can if you click on it, and you read about it, they sell more ads. So they keep writing about Elon Musk and everything he says on Twitter because it drives advertising revenue. But what it also does is really Rob, you have the opportunity to hear about all these other companies that are doing great things that the media doesn’t cover, or they don’t have the staff to cover. And so that’s where the AI comes in, it can monitor the entire market for you. And really, for the first time ever, you have a personal assistant in reading and understanding and analysing financial news and financial announcements. And you can take that and create a very customised AI search agents look for just this type of thing that you want. So if you say, You know what, I really love investing in energy companies, and you go out look for energy companies that are growing revenue, at least 10% growing earnings, at least 20% and recently increased their dividend by you know, whatever percent, I just alert me every time that happens, I don’t have to do anything, ever again, on my research, I’m gonna get an alert, right in my email, when my criteria is matched. And if that’s my investment thesis, then I just go along on on those investments. So there’s a lot of flexibility in the platform. And what we’re really trying to do is kind of break down that barrier that most people have, and not being able to monitor the market at scale, not being able to see those was really interesting. bull markets, or in some cases, bear markets, because we can go both ways, you know, in the, in the strategies, short and long, that are reacting to different macroeconomic events. And we see that on the basis of company financials, we see that in the basis of what CEOs are saying and our financial outlook. We see that in the basis of what the leadership is doing with capital allocation. And so, you know, an example is when, you know, when Russia invaded Ukraine, there was in the middle of a pretty decent sell off already in 2022. That was happening. And this really accelerated the market sell off. But there were some companies that were thriving. I doubt many people would know what those companies were could list them, but a lot of them were fertiliser manufacturers that are based in Canada and the United States. And the reason was, they couldn’t get fertilisers, which a large percentage of them came from Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, you couldn’t get them out of that region because of the conflict. So the price of these types of fertilisers was rising was doubling. And so companies that weren’t involved in the conflict and could export their product. Were then selling it for double the price. And so what we saw on the platform was a slew of fertiliser companies, increasing their dividends doing special dividends, increasing stock buybacks, and we’re sort of you know, beating earnings and we’re wondering what is going on with fertiliser companies? I had no idea I never bought a fertiliser company in my life. But you do two seconds of Google research you say okay, they sell this you know, potash potash is a lot of it coming out at Bell roofs, they can’t get it. Price is 100 percent bull market for fertiliser companies. And so this one company that I actually invested in, called nutrient because Canadian, you know, the share price jumped 75% In about two months. So, you know, if you’re an investor and you can go straight equity, you can leverage with options, stock options, you can make a lot of money on those types of things. But you have to have the awareness, you have to know those things are going on. And you have to have a system is sort of connecting the dots for you fast enough for you to react otherwise, you know, you’re kind of going to sit in the same 789 stocks forever, not really knowing why they’re going up and down. Yeah, gotcha.

Gene Tunny  10:43

Are you scanning social media too? Because I mean, some of the names, you mentioned them, and you think of some of these high flying CEOs. Many of them are engaging in risky activities, you know, go into space, and all of that. I mean, are you scanning social media for for, you know, hints of, you know, potential, you know, shock news,

Andrew Einhorn  11:04

we were a little bit, we kind of pulled back from it, because Twitter was cutting off access to their data sets and their API to third party developers like us. But we also found it for the most part, you know, we were relying wanted to rely on the company announcement as much as possible. We want to do overweight, potential pumping, dumps that, you know, market manipulation that can sometimes happen. We’re trying to protect, you know, the users and the investors on our platform. Because there are some savvy, bad actors out there that will utilise social media to pump up stocks and fake news. And, you know, sometimes, if you’re not watching closely, you can fall prey to that.

Gene Tunny  11:44

Yeah, that’s a good point. Yeah. So there’s a lot. Yeah, so yeah, you got to be careful, you don’t really know what, what’s true out there. So that’s a really good point. Whereas with the company reports, I mean, obviously, they’re, you know, they’ve got a legal obligation to tell the truth, but have been sometimes, of course, you know, there can be,

Andrew Einhorn  12:03

and that happens to they, you know, sometimes the reports are fake, there was a company. I forget the name, but the ticker was to T IO. And they faked all their financials. And it looked like, you know, they did this wonderful quarter, and they were growing by 5,000%. And it was like, wow, one of the scenarios in the events that we tracked is the short seller reports. So, in funds, you know, they specialise in kind of busting the fakers that are out there in the market. And so he saw in our platform, those short sale report went up on this, went out on this company to and said, you know, all the all the founders were criminals, and they had already been convicted fraud before. Looks like they’re doing fraud. Again, they investigated some of these alleged sales contracts that they had that were worth, like a billion dollars. And what the company had done was sort of open up like a shell LLC, create a fake purchase order back to the company, and use that as sort of evidence that they were driving sales up. And so the whole thing just fizzled out. And so you do you do see a good amount of that, you know, years back, it was luck, and Coffea, China, they were faking their arse. And a similar kind of hedge fund, you know, put up a camera and started counting how many people actually went into the luck and coffees and said, you know, if, if their numbers are right, then they’re they’re serving four times the number a couple of coffees and Starbucks. Yeah, yeah.

Gene Tunny  13:39

So I just want to talk a bit about the AI, because you mentioned you’re scanning these company reports and news from the companies. And so to an extent, you’ve got to trust what’s coming out of them. And what have you got, is it so people talk about, and this is what I want to explore with you, because I think pre show we were talking about how, look, there’s been applications of AI for years. And there’s been things like algorithmic trading, which I mean, I’d be interested in your thoughts on how close that is to the AI, whether that’s a true AI, that the public discussion about AI is just really taken off with these, what they call these generative, pre trained transformers, if you’ve got that, right, the GPT chat GPT, where we’ve got that interaction with a Can you talk about please Andrew, they’ll try to explain, like what you’re doing, is it a are you using a GPT? Is that right? And how does it differ from what other people have done in the past

Andrew Einhorn  14:43

now we developed our own proprietary artificial intelligence system. And the way you kind of think about it is, you know, the chat. gfpt is sort of the mouth of a body. And the stuff that we’re doing is more like The beating heart. Right. And so the interaction with AI through chat, GBT is obviously, you know, through chat, it’s a communication channel. And so that’s one deployment of AI. whereas ours is more sort of, like, you know, a monitoring, AI, it’s going and finding different pieces of information that are out there. It’s making sense of them putting them together, you know, it’s a little bit more like cognitive functioning, I should say, probably better, better than the heart analogy. And so AI, in general, can be anything, you know, very, very basic tasks, very, very difficult sort of self directed tasks, it sort of depends on on your goal. Chat. GPT is great, you know, for interacting, but it’s completely reliant on third party data that has already found the answer to the question that it’s now speaking, right. It’s not thinking and processing for itself, it’s going into a database of information that it knows. And then it’s extracting that information and then saying to you, and like, plain language, here’s what I found, you know, a little bit more like an advanced Google search. And so what we’re doing is we’re finding the answer, right? So if you ask a question, like, why was Apple stock down yesterday, you’re gonna get some message that says, you know, my, my training only goes to February 2023. We, you know, we don’t do real time analysis, or might say something like, Well, according to this one news article, you know, blah, blah, blah. It’s not doing anything on its own, it’s just summarization, our system is going out and coming up with an answer, because we are not only extracting what happened in that event. So let’s use the example of Apple. So Apple stock goes down yesterday, we find out that Apple made an announcement through our AI and AI identifies Apple doing a product release of vision, pro whatever. And then in the system, it’s identified that the share price moved down. And that was the only major event. So those pieces of information the AI then puts together and says the reason why apples down was this bullish event product launch, which, you know, seven times out of 10 is actually negative for Apple. Now that we have that piece of information, you could overlay something like a Chet GPT into our database and say, Hey, why was Apple stock down yesterday, it would look at our data, pull it out and be able to summarise, you know, coordinate a level fields. This was because of, you know, blah, blah, blah, like Apple stock was down because of a product launch that didn’t go well, instead of you. If you look at that at scale, and say, Okay, well, our system is more was a research agent that’s actively out there looking for information, assessing what’s going on analysing what’s going on, and then coming up with a data array of information, just showcase what happened. It gives you far more information about what’s likely to occur next. And I think the best example I can give is like a weather report. Yeah, here’s where it’s raining, here’s where it’s sunny, there’s an 80% chance that the rain is going to be four inches of rain. And it’s going to last for 12 hours. And that’s kind of what the analytics of historical data sets like ours can provide. And so if you are, you know, a type of person who wants to invest in stocks, but maybe doesn’t necessarily want to listen to someone’s opinion on CNBC, or, you know, one of these newsletter services, this is this is the next Amazon or these are five other stocks that are better than Amazon, you can actually look at the data set and see, well, this company had a big bullish event, this bullish event 80% of the time, ends up in a positive price return of 20% over the next X number of days, weeks, months. And so we’re trying to move away from that, you know, kind of human opinion driven stock market and move closer towards an understanding of how things normally play out. And a lot of the market, to your extent is is driven by algorithmic trading. And those trades, about 60% of the trades in the market are automated. And so why, how are they automated or automated on the basis of patterns that people are telling it to find? And so if you know how the algorithms are reacting, and you know what they’re reacting to, when you find the reason why they’re reacting, it’s easy to predict what happens next. And usually, they’re using some kind of technical analysis, looking at patterns and charts. And so the piece that we really plug in and say, well, these patterns and graphs and movements on the charts. That’s great. But events caused them. And so what we often see as the event happens, it starts to raise the price from the for the stock that that people are watching, then the algorithms see that price movement, because it breaks the pattern of some kind of technical analysis. And then the algorithms buy it and drive it even further. So you have that kind of double burst if you can get out in front of these events. Right. And that’s a lot of how the market moves. Yeah.

Gene Tunny  20:28

So yeah, a few follow ups. This is fascinating. Is your AI? Is it trying to then model how the algorithms will respond? Is it? Or are you just looking at the impact of events, so I know that you’ve from a previous interview, you’ve done your you’ve done a lot of deep research, we’ve looked at Google Scholar, you’ve pulled out studies, events, studies, which show how particular events impact the market, so you’ve got that information, or you also, and you know, there might be an immediate impact to you, then, are you trying to maybe to some extent, they’ve looked at this themselves, but are you then looking at how the market reacts through the reactions of all the other participants through the algorithmic trading, etc,

Andrew Einhorn  21:10

you look at an aggregate. So we think of market participants just broadly how it reacts, right, and in some cases, the system you can see, the speed of the reaction differs depending on the event type. For example, one of the events we track is an increase in dividend amount. You invest in dividend stocks are generally not moving really fast. You know, they’re there for longer term, they’re collecting dividends. And so the price action on that first event is relatively slow. Whereas other events, like a company being added to an s&p 500 index, there are big hedge funds that trade that specific scenario that have spent a lot of money to develop algorithms to buy shares, the second, the s&p organisation announces a new cause, you know, a new constituent in the index, that does trade very quickly. When we just show it, we just you can see it on the platform that they have, the average move is a percent done at an event like this. And if you start to look at some of the data, you’ll see it moves fast versus a dividend event, which may be moving slowly over several days, you know, and then if you’re looking at some of these things, in aggregate, like multiple dividend increases over the span of let’s say, a year, year and a half, you then can predict longer term gains, you know, a company that’s repeatedly saying things are good, so much, and they’re so good, we’re gonna give away money. And then that other pattern starts to reveal itself. And so it really depends how you want to use the system. And we’re, we’re very much the data provider using the AI to kind of showcase these patterns that exist all over the market. And in some cases, you can take kind of contrarian views or find these, you know, hidden gems that you would never see before. Just just just by having access to all of the data at kind of the palm of your hand. My favourite example is a stock called very, very active. It’s VR TV got bought out, but years ago, this was mid March 2020. We’re in the middle of COVID. And stock market selling off, we are going into lockdown globally. You know, the big ship is moving towards New York, you know, with extra hospital beds. And there’s there’s a there’s a panic. At that time, most companies, you know, are starting to slash their dividends. They’re looking at cost saving measures. There’s one company that came in started doing stock buybacks or buying back there shares. And it’s a very brave move. And you would think, stupid move for somebody to take their company’s cash right as we’re going into, you know, potentially a global depression and take that cash and start buying back their shares with it instead of using it for operating capital. Why would they do that? Well, this particular company is a engineering and kind of design firm. They build and sell direct to consumer product packaging, isn’t it that everybody used to sell through the big stores who had a product could no longer sell to the big box stores. They had to get it to your doorstep that required new type of packaging. In order to do that. The whole world was going through the same issue. Everybody’s Sitting at home buying stuff. And now you Commerce has completely shifted, this company is sitting in the middle of what ended up being a goldmine for them. And that precipitated a stock run of 2,600% growth over the next three years. And you would have never seen that had you not been following, you know, why would anybody be doing this random stock buyback in the middle of COVID. And so that’s the kind of thing that this system can can identify. And it’s, it’s, it’s a proof point that the macro economic event is either positively or negatively impacting, you know, these individual stocks. And you can’t, you can’t monitor the market for that kind of thing, because stocks still went down. That was a funny thing. And you hear people, you know, they’ll give a criticism, well, I just look to see what stocks are up. And when stocks are down, well, then it happens after Seminary has decided what to do. In this case, the stock kept going down for the next couple of weeks while the market sold off, and then began 26x run over the next three years.

Gene Tunny  26:09

Okay, we’ll take a short break here for a word from our sponsor.

Female speaker  26:15

If you need to crunch the numbers, then get in touch with adept economics. We offer you Frank and fearless economic analysis and advice. We can help you with funding submissions, cost benefit analysis studies, and economic modelling of all sorts. Our head office is in Brisbane, Australia, but we work all over the world. You can get in touch via our website, www dot adapt economics.com.au. We’d love to hear from you.

Gene Tunny  26:44

Now back to the show. Where are you guys? Do you in direct somewhere you’re in DC, the DC area or Baltimore? Is that right? Yeah, just

Andrew Einhorn  26:55

outside of Washington DC. We’re a Virginia based company.

Gene Tunny  26:58

Right authority. So Virginia rather than Maryland. And so if you’re you must have computer scientists on staff. Do you who develop this proprietary AI? I mean, what what’s your operation look like? Do you have? And you have people? Do you have actual analysts as well, I mean, you’re you solely relying on the AI to deliver the predictions.

Andrew Einhorn  27:21

We have all the above. You know, we have couple PhDs, some in linguistics, some in AI, some in physics, astrophysics, at do a lot of good in the modelling, and analysis work, we have those who have financial backgrounds, we have a lot of financial advisors that are from the street or certain hedge funds, previously, and sort of former lives that have helped devise the system. And so a lot of what we’re really trying to do is think, what are the big annoying, tedious, time consuming tasks that you have to do as an investor to figure out what to buy? And how can we automate that, all of it so that the barrier goes away. So you don’t have to sit there time and time again, doing a stock screen, or, you know, fiddling through a news feed for an hour and a half to keep up with what’s going on with your existing investments. We just want to streamline at all we want to give superpowers of investment research to an average person. So we started, you know, this process back in 2019. And it took several years to get it right. Part of it is built on historical academic models of others across the world that have studied, you know, how events impact share prices, some of them are original to us, others, you know, belong to hedge funds that we knew, use some of these event driven strategies and said, You know what, we could do this within our platform, let’s just put that on there. There should, shouldn’t need to have $10 million, you know, to be able to participate in the market. And so we saw subscription costs, very, very low, it’s the equivalent of $19 a month as our starting point. And then it goes up to 167 a month, depending on the tier that people are subscribing for, and the level of information that they want. But it makes it unique, more accessible to more people. So that you don’t have to rely on television stations, which frankly, are very often helping to push a narrative or push a particular stock, right? It’s often that these large asset managers are selling shares while they’re on TV talking about how great stock is because they need to sell 30 million shares. They need, you know, millions of buyers to offload those shares. Yeah,

Gene Tunny  29:54

yeah. So this is a you’re aiming at retail investors so you can Get this on while your browser or your phone, there’s an app for it, I imagine and you said their email alerts, is that right?

Andrew Einhorn  30:07

There’s email alerts. Yeah, we are, you can certainly access it from your phone, we don’t have a specific app, but we have mobile ready. And mobile accessible pages, you can get on your desktop, it’s very easy to use to try to make it as simple as like shopping for a flight on an airline. And unlike even unlike that, where you have to put in your destination, if you want, you can just browse to see, you know, what events that happened recently? And what are the price movements, quickly set an alert, and forget it, you know, and then the alert comes in, it will say, Hey, this is a bullish event. Share price typically moves, you know, X percent over time, or you can look into your own analysis, you know, based on the data that’s in there. So raw, we’ve tried to keep it very, very simple. Good one,

Gene Tunny  30:55

do you have any data on the performance of people who use your platform, or who you who use level fields,

Andrew Einhorn  31:03

we don’t track them. We have regularly, you know, get feedback, like thanks made a bunch of money on this are 1000 today that was, you know, bang for my subscription, 10 times, we do have a level we call it level two service. This is more of our white glove service where we have analysts that monitor the AI alerts. And they kind of cherry pick the best ones, and we’ve sent it out. And it’s really for people that want a little bit more help picking out your entry and your exit point that that service really outperformed our expectations. We we looked at the closed alerts for our first year of operating that and the return was 2,800% cumulative over the course of the year.

Gene Tunny  31:53

Right for the cherry picked alerts. Right. Okay. Do you have any data or any? I guess it’d be a very difficult thing to do. But of all the alerts, I mean, are you giving explicit bias buy or sell recommendations on with these alerts? Or are you just saying this, you should be paying attention to this?

Andrew Einhorn  32:14

Well, it will say, you know, this is a bullish event than in a bullish event, the share price goes up, right, so I tell them to buy, but it will say the share price is gonna go up, you can do whatever you want with that information, and it’s gonna go up by 3% in the first day, and then you know, 75% of the time by day 10, it’s going to be up this much. And so it’s really your job as the investor to say you how you want to play it, we have all types of users of the system, some will just buy it and make a quarter percent every single day. And others want to be able to just find the event that’s going to be up, you know, 100%, and they’re okay, waiting all year for two or three of those, which they do happen. They have others who have a lot of stocks in their portfolio. And what they’re looking to do is just find opportunities to make more money off the stocks that they have. So if they own apple, and Apple has a positive event, they get alerted to that. And they might sell an option contract for extra premium when this bullish event happens. Knowing that on day two, according to the statistics, that particular event actually pulls back to where it was people started to sell. So, you know, we’re we’re not trying to create the strategies per se, for folks, they’re there for the taking. And there’s a lot of guidance on the system. But the data itself is very revealing. It’s like, okay, if you knew every time you walk out the door, what the weather is, like, you know how to dress. This is the same thing. Like, you know what, what to do when these events happen. And that’s been a lot of the problem in the market is often people overreact, because they don’t know how bad the bad news is. They don’t know how good the good news is. And you see this like massive overreaction, you know, 2021, the whole year, but you see it all the time, you know, bow past where it’s supposed to be and then eventually pulls down and people get hurt because they buy at the top, and then they start selling on the way down and then stock goes back up. So, you know, it’s just as much about avoiding bad decisions, as it is finding good investments. And some of the events that we put on there we know, are 5050 they could go either way. You know, there’s a Tesla one on there as an example, and test the product launches. There’s a lot of traders that like to think, oh, every time there’s a new Tesla product, of course, Tesla’s gonna go up. It’s not true. After time goes down. And we we’ve gotten criticism for putting that event type on there. They’re like, well, like Can’t really trade this is 5050. And we’re sort of saying, well, that’s the point. Stop making bad decisions. That’s what we put it on there. So I knew it was like flipping a coin. Yes. Good point. Can I ask what? What markets you and you mentioned, you’re in, so equities in the US and there was what over 6000 companies on? Was it on the s&p. So New York Stock Exchange, Stock Exchange? Yep. Anything traded on the New York Stock Exchange anything on the NASDAQ, and we have some of the larger companies on the OTC so that includes foreign companies that have ADRs that trades in the US, it also includes, you know, the OTC Markets, which are some of the bigger European companies, like Volkswagen, is there. Yeah.

Gene Tunny  35:52

Okay. So just in equities? Are you in fixed income in bonds at all? Now?

Andrew Einhorn  35:57

Not yet, we’re just sticking to straight equities at the moment, although we do have a lot of option traders that use the platform to inform, you know, their particular option trades. Gotcha.

Gene Tunny  36:09

Okay. So as your competitive advantage, you’re getting this information quicker, because you’re getting a you’re looking at these reports that other analysts may not you’re getting a feed? Is it? Is it an API, you’re tapping into an API to get these reports? And then you’ve got the, the AI that analyses them all? Quickly? And there’s some AI magic there, it’s a neural net or some or something? Is that what is that what’s going on? You’re able to get this information in your Hoover it up, analyse it extremely quickly, and then push out the the advice is that essentially, what it’s about, in

Andrew Einhorn  36:51

a way? Yeah, I mean, it’s not necessarily a speed issue. You know, we certainly try to get the information as fast as we can. And largely, we get it within 45 minutes of an event taking place. Or being announced. We get the information ourselves, which means we data mined it ourselves, we pull it in, and we have it. And what the AI is really doing is it’s like a speed reader. So it’s reading 30,000 documents a minute. Yeah, okay, you just got through 30,000 reports. And then within that extracting 21 million events per year. And then looking at a group of events, saying okay, of these 21 million events, which ones actually move the share price and which ones don’t matter. And so then it’s selecting out about five or 6000 events that are known. We call them material events in their material to the share price movement. Once that happens, we’re then identifying what company had that event, pairing it with real time price action from the markets, to then correlate whether or not that particular event has had an impact on that particular equity. And then as we do that, for groups of events, let’s just say, you know, CEO departures, we have every CEO departure in an aggregate data set. And then you can look and say, Well, how to co departures, typically affect share prices, and it’s one click away. And there’s summary statistics that will show you okay, it moves in 4%. And it’s usually a bullish event. And then you can filter that information if you want. So, you know, is it the same cases in energy companies, as in tech companies? Is it the same case in large tech versus small tech, which is not the same case. So very quickly, you can kind of see, you know, with a couple filters, what’s going on there. And now that we have the data, yeah, you can get alerted to it. And you can act on it, if you want to trade it. Or you could just use it to do faster research. You know, by having all that you don’t have to read all that information yourself, because you just knew you now know what the main events are. For the equity that you’re doing research on, let’s see, pull up apple. In the platform, you put Apple Company page, and then you pull up a chart. And typically when you look at a stock chart, its ups and downs, ups and downs. Don’t know why it’s ups and downs, right? We’re just looking at it. And then normally, you would have to say, Okay, why did Apple drop 20% On this day? Let me go to look at a news feed. Let me go to the day of the news and look at the, you know, 300 articles that were about Apple that day and try to find information that would tell me why was it down 20% In this one day, you no longer have to do that. Because right on our charts, we have the event appended there that move the share price. And so you save yourself all that hassle all that time as you look at In Apple graph, you know, there might be 20 events, and each event is right before all those big movements on the graph, you can look at it that way, you could just scroll down the screen and see a list of all the recent events that Apple has has happened product launches, buybacks, dividends and so forth. And you just get within 15 seconds of view of, you know, what are the recent things that have happened to this company. And a lot of that is, is missing from the market today. Because if you were to go to something like a typical stock screener, and your brokerage system, and you’re gonna go, oh, I want to find out, I want to find a stock that has a great dividend, right? You’ll find these companies that have a 12% dividend. And you got to then then your research really begins because you get to find out, is there a weird reason why they have a 12% dividend, and then you pull up the share price? stock chart, and it shows that it was $60. And now it’s a $20 stock, which is why the dividend is now 12%. But why did it drop from $60 to 20? Now you have to go and do that research on our platform, you know, we would tell you, hey, you know, they’re filing for bankruptcy. You don’t need to do any research like that. But then it’s still what it is, they haven’t got it yet. So it’s time savings. It’s finding it investments, monitoring the market at large, setting your research process to be automated, but he’s AI search agents that you can use out of the box that we have or customised yourself, and really just see a lot more of what’s going on in the market and why it’s moving the way it’s moving. Right? So

Gene Tunny  41:43

you say AI search agents, out of the box that you have? Is this stuff you’ve developed? Or you’ve you’ve licenced from somewhere else?

Andrew Einhorn  41:54

No, we build everything from scratch, build everything. Right? Okay. So

Gene Tunny  41:58

you’ve How long have you been going have you been going before GPT and the GPT 3.5, for

Andrew Einhorn  42:06

where we started in 2019. Although I will say we had a company before this for 10 years that we operated, which also was an event monitoring system of sorts. Our client base was actually the publicly traded companies. And so the software system we built in that company did similar monitor events for large corporations. But it wasn’t geared towards investors, it was geared towards the public relations professionals that publicly traded companies. And so we’d see these patterns, and that, you know, something bad would happen, like if it was a train company, that train would come off the tracks for ash into a river or spill pollution, then the share price would plummet on the stock. And they would lose billions of dollars in market cap. And this would happen again. And again. And again, you know, same same type of event, same type of company. In other situations, you might have, you know, a data breach, like a cybersecurity data breach, then the company’s share price would fall. And so our software monitor that, and would send alerts to the corporate affairs and corporate communications people and they would get up in front of the podium where they would get the press releases out. And they would say, well, this wasn’t our fault. You know, they was actually the oil company that overloaded the train. And they would try to shake, save the share price by kind of blame. And so we have a lot of experience in that for 10 years. And then, you know, during that time, we’re like, maybe we on the wrong side of this issue, you know, we’re saving these people, billions of dollars a year. Maybe we should be using, you know, our knowledge and events to help make investments. And we sort of put that aside for a little while, sold the company and then started a new company and started checking with different ideas of what we could do with AI and how do we prove what we did the last 10 years. And then COVID hit in 2020. And it was like Aha, events, events, change everything that’s focused on events.

Gene Tunny  44:09

I do and day they’re doing day. You’ve got a fascinating backstory there. And I might, I’ll link in the show notes to a interview you did with on the side hustle city podcast, which was really good interview. And yeah, you told the full story and how you did consulting work for the Pentagon. I think it was and and then yeah, yeah. And your management, did management consulting, you did a grad, you did graduate studies at George Washington, if I remember correctly. So you’ve got an academic background, too, which is great. Yeah, so I’ll put a link in the show notes to that. I’ve just got a couple more questions. I’m wondering about hedge funds because one thing, some of the points you’re making, I’m thinking of that’s similar to the Ray Dalio Philosophy of because he’s he’s very interested in history and looking at how historical events played out and learning from those learning from events in the past. Imagine something, you know, Bridgewater or other hedge funds around the place, they must be interested in this sort of thing. Are they? Do you have any hedge fund clients? Are they like competitors of yours? Or how do you see? How do you see the other financial market players?

Andrew Einhorn  45:25

We don’t have a hedge fund clients, we certainly have some that have come to us. I don’t know if they’re pretending to be client or wanting to be a client, but they’re certainly interested in our methodologies and technology. I think, you know, just like any new tech in the market, you’re going to piss off some people. Have they cornered? And, you know, we’re trying to give some of these strategies to the general population and democratise access, and not everyone likes that. So we’re expecting it, you know, and the right now, you know, we’re for a self directed investor construct. The platform says it’s for personal use, commercial use, you know, will we make an API, you know, that can be accessed in the future? For certain types of data? Maybe, you know, we’re we’re looking at different ways that we could look, take our massive amounts of data that we have, and kind of enable different levels of processing of that data set. So yeah, I mean, it’s, it’s it’s an interesting marketplace, and that there are a lot of different strategies that people are deploying, there are large firms that have event driven strategies, some of them are fairly straightforward. Some of them are complicated. And it is a factor of historical information. But how you can utilise these patterns in the market to make better investments to make quicker money. I mean, the most famous trade in the world at this point was Bill Ackman straight during COVID, where he shorted the market while being on television, telling everybody to panic on CNBC, and made, you know, a couple billion dollars on that market short. And so the fund returned something like 75% that year. So when you can do those massive trades, then it’s great. You know, why? Why would you sit in the market all year, and watch, you know, these constant ebbs and flows of events, change the trajectory, or you’ve got wars that are breaking out, we have, you know, freighters that are being shot at oil prices are up, oil prices are down to nothing like you can’t, you know, and then you’re trying to be an investor and buy and hold philosophy, and then maybe you got a gain or you lose for the year, it doesn’t make sense to sit there forever, when you can just make that in a short period of time, hang out in cash at 5% yield, and then go back into the market when it’s safer. So our kind of method, or general philosophy really puts the buy and hold method on notice. And raw calls BS, okay, and says, you know, what, buy and hold is great if you’ve got the greatest stocks in the history of the market. But most of the time, it doesn’t work out so well. You know, GE, was the biggest stock in the s&p 500 in 2002. Now, it’s below where it was trading 20 years ago, that you’re buying and holding, you’re constantly losing money for two decades. You know, likewise, if you were to buy the s&p 500, in 2000, you would not make a single dollar until 2013 13 years later. So yeah, there’s a lot of these market myths about how long you should be holding and, you know, dollar cost averaging and things like that, that are that are kind of baked in narratives pushed by asset managers, banks, so you keep your money parked with them, and they can make money off your money. Yeah, look,

Gene Tunny  49:19

I think you make a lot of good points there, we might have to have you back on the show served over the future to have to have this discussion. Because I mean, I’m, as an economist, I am sympathetic to the view of, you know, just, you know, it’s time and time and time in the market beats timing the market, if you know what I mean. So I’m sympathetic to the view that the best thing you can do is just, you know, invest in the index and just let it grow over time. But I have to I do take your points. I don’t want to have a I don’t want to debate it out now. But it might be good to have a discussion in the future because I think it’s yeah, it’s a really important issue that you’re getting out there in terms of how we think about Investing.

Andrew Einhorn  50:01

Oh, yeah. And you know, I would just add that the argue, but it depends on your timeline. Right. Like it’s great. Yes. He’s got unlimited time. Fantastic. Eventually it’ll be right. Yeah, someday. But for a lot of people, they need to access their money. It’s an unreasonable assumption, you know that you’re not going to touch your money for 20 years.

Gene Tunny  50:19

Yeah. Yeah. I think one of the points. Yeah, it’s, it’s a, it’s an important point you’re making and I mean, one of the challenges like in Australia here, we’re we’ve moved towards individual retirement accounts, we move toward that in the 90s. And so a lot of people ended up, they’re relying on Super, and then, you know, what happens if you’re a retiree? And then, you know, the market goes down? 40%, like it did in the financial crisis, right. And then yeah, I mean, it’s

Andrew Einhorn  50:49

bad times every time when you’re 78 years old.

Gene Tunny  50:53

Yeah. People ended up having to keep working for for several years. But yeah, that was a that was an awful event. Right. Yeah, that bill, that was it. Bill Ackman. You mentioned with a, I’m gonna have to look up that. I mean, that’s outrageous. And that’s why, you know, that’s what outrages the public about, you know, the activities on Wall Street’s I remember seeing

Andrew Einhorn  51:14

it live. I mean, he just, he scared the hell out of me. When I was watching TV. I was like, I didn’t think it was gonna be this bad. But now I do. Yeah. Shocking. If you just Google greatest trade of all time. Yeah. You’ll you’ll see the data sources on it. But you know, the fact is, was that a lot of this stuff, that historical data gives you plenty of ammo for how to navigate the markets, for instance, the look back at Zika and SQL, but yeah, that was spreading and in 2016. And they closed the ports of Miami. And the cruise ship stocks, on average dropped about six and a half percent when they close those ports. COVID had a transmission inside the country for the first time in the US, I think it was in Houston. And cruise ship stocks went down six and a half percent. Same reaction to the virus just seven hours later. So there’s always historical reference. And you gotta remember that the people who are moving the markets are also looking at the history of

Gene Tunny  52:21

IT. Yeah. People like Ray Dalio is crew at Bridgewater. Yeah, absolutely. Very good point. Right. Final, final question. I just want to ask you, like, what’s the reaction among the financial establishment to this approach? Because there’s a, I was just wondering about it, because there was a very negative opinion piece by Gregory Zuckerman in the Wall Street Journal last year. So April 12 2023. Ai can write a song, but it can’t be the market quants have tried for decades with limited success. At the biggest challenge, all very negative about it. I mean, how do you react? What do you think about what do you think about that? I mean, what’s the what’s the reaction out there to what you’re trying to do?

Andrew Einhorn  53:12

Well, there’s there’s two questions there. The first is, you know, the, the article itself, I think is, has a little bit of a misnomer about what AI is, and only is right, there’s this belief that AI is sort of the profit, right, it’s sort of the crystal ball that can see the future because it’s, you know, super crunching all these numbers and coming up with perfect algorithms that humans can’t possibly imagine. And there are certain people that are working on that. But largely, that’s not what AI is, AI is, for the most part, replacing kind of grunt tasks that we don’t want to do anymore. Things that humans can do, the computers can just do faster and at scale. And so you know, when you say something like aI can’t beat the market, but it’s really saying is an AI created algorithm to beat the market won’t beat the market. And there’s been very little development of sort of AI generated algorithms. It’s usually a human using AI to crunch numbers and then coming up with the algorithm that it then allows AI to execute. So the human is integrated through the whole process. And just by that biassing, the outcome of this, you know, assessment. I would take the view that, you know, AI is a tool in the toolbox of doing whatever you want to do much like a hammer versus a power drill. Difference. Yeah, you know, you could go hammer out the nails, or you could have a nail gun. And the AI is the nail gun for most tasks. And so if you’ve got a nail gun, you’re gonna get your job done faster than the guy that’s sitting there. with a hammer, gotcha.

Gene Tunny  55:00

Yeah, yeah. Okay, so all fascinating. Andrew, really, really enjoyed the conversation, are you looking at extending into, say, Australia or the UK because your us focused or have I got that wrong, where

Andrew Einhorn  55:14

us focus, but we, we actually collect data in about 35,000 different equities. We’ve just been rolling out, kind of slow and steady to make sure we don’t overwhelm the user. Those stocks do include Australian stocks, they do include, you know, the London Stock Exchange. So, you know, if demand is high enough, we’ll provide access to that and the same model. A lot of the large stocks, you know, it’s in both of those exchanges, like AstraZeneca, for example, or, you know, forget big mining companies that are ADRs that do trade in the US. Trade in the US market, I was trying to remember what the big mining companies in Australia but not remembering Olga bhp,

Gene Tunny  56:01

Rio Tinto, so yeah, so

Andrew Einhorn  56:05

those are in the system, you know, as an example, okay. Because global again, and you know, anything above generally, about $10 billion market cap is going to be traded in the US exchanges. Gotcha. Okay.

Gene Tunny  56:19

Excellent. All right. Andrew, on hold, this has been terrific. Any final points before we wrap up,

Andrew Einhorn  56:25

I would just say, you know, if, if you’re interested, and you’re out jogging, or you’re working out at the gym, while you’re listening to this, the company name is level fields, AI, you know, text yourself, write it down. If you don’t feel like you can use it for your own investments, you probably know somebody that might please get the word out. We have a discount code of podcast 23 that you can apply. And you can get a discount on this subscription. Rod. Is

Gene Tunny  56:56

that all caps? So

Andrew Einhorn  56:57

does it matter? It doesn’t matter? No. Okay, excellent. The number 23 for level fields

Gene Tunny  57:03

mastering Okay, enter on well, and thanks so much for your time. I really enjoyed the conversation. And yeah, I really learned a lot. And for sure, this is this is part of the, the way of the future. So it’s fascinating to learn what people are doing out there like yourself. So all the best with it in the future. And I look forward to seeing more of what you’re doing in in future years. So thanks so much.

Andrew Einhorn  57:29

Thank you. I appreciate having me on and happy to come back and have that buy and hold debate. Good

Gene Tunny  57:35

one. I think about that for sure. Okay. Thanks, Andrew.

Andrew Einhorn  57:38

Thank you,

Gene Tunny  57:41

Rocco. Thanks for listening to this episode of economics explored. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please get in touch. I’d love to hear from you. You can send me an email via contact at economics explore.com Or a voicemail via SpeakPipe. You can find the link in the show notes. If you’ve enjoyed the show, I’d be grateful if you could tell anyone you think would be interested about it. Word of mouth is one of the main ways that people learn about the show. Finally, if your podcasting app lets you then please write a review and leave a rating. Thanks for listening. I hope you can join me again next week.

58:28

Thank you for listening. We hope you enjoyed the episode. For more content like this where to begin your own podcasting journey head on over to obsidian-productions.com

Credits

Thanks to Obsidian Productions for mixing the episode and to the show’s sponsor, Gene’s consultancy business www.adepteconomics.com.au. Full transcripts are available a few days after the episode is first published at www.economicsexplored.com. Economics Explored is available via Apple PodcastsGoogle Podcast, and other podcasting platforms.

Categories
Podcast episode

Exploring Investment Opportunities in 2024 and Beyond, w/ Will Nutting, Nutstuff  – EP219

Show host Gene Tunny interviews former investment banker Will Nutting, who runs the investment newsletter “Nutstuff”, to discuss emerging investment opportunities in 2024 and beyond. Will explains how he focuses on unloved areas like coal, uranium and cannabis that many investors overlook. He also emphasizes the importance of factoring geopolitical risks into investments and outlines opportunities that he sees in gold, Bitcoin, distressed debt, and investments in Russia. Will discusses how paying attention to geopolitics can provide an investment edge and outlines his process for gathering insights from his extensive network. Please note that the discussion is meant to provide general information and not specific investment advice.

Please contact us with any questions, comments and suggestions by emailing us at contact@economicsexplored.com or sending a voice message via https://www.speakpipe.com/economicsexplored.

You can listen to the episode via the embedded player below or via podcasting apps including Google PodcastsApple Podcasts and Spotify.

About this episode’s guest Will Nutting

Will is the Founder and CEO of Nutstuff, a no-nonsense, investment newsletter with 2K+ subscribers, including CEOs and CFOs of some of the world’s biggest financial institutions, founders of the most exciting startups, investors at the highest performing funds across private and public markets, and HNWIs.

Will has been writing about and investing in markets since the 1990s, focusing on U.S. and global equities, and has had the good fortune to interact with and exchange ideas with many smart investors.

What’s covered in EP219

  • Investment banking, media analysis, and providing a better perspective. (1:59)
  • Geopolitics, equity research, and market trends. (7:32)
  • Potential peace treaty between Russia and Ukraine. (13:24)
  • Geopolitical tensions, global debt, and the future of Western nations. (16:53)
  • Investment strategies and geopolitical risks. (22:51)
  • Energy policy, ESG investing, and the future of fossil fuels. (28:31)
  • Investing in various market caps, including small and mid-cap stocks. (34:01)
  • Crypto investing and market trends. (36:29)
  • Geopolitics, investing, and global markets. (42:30)
  • Investing in distressed debt and real estate. (47:29)

Takeaways

  • Will Nutting believes opportunities exist in unloved areas like coal, uranium, offshore drilling, and cannabis/marijuana stocks.
  • Geopolitical risks like those in Ukraine, the Middle East, and China/Taiwan need to be factored into investments. 
  • Distressed debt could provide opportunities if the economic situation deteriorates.
  • Will is positioning for 2024 by focusing on gold, Bitcoin, commodities producers, and select technology companies.

Links relevant to the conversation

Will Nutting’s newsletter Nutstuff:

https://www.nutstuff.co.uk/

Transcript: Exploring Investment Opportunities in 2024 and Beyond, w/ Will Nutting, Nutstuff  – EP219

N.B. This is a lightly edited version of a transcript originally created using the AI application otter.ai. It may not be 100 percent accurate, but should be pretty close. If you’d like to quote from it, please check the quoted segment in the recording.

Will Nutting  00:04

But the people who actually can open their eyes and go and look at what’s going on in the world, there’s, there’s never been a more exciting time to my mind to make money in equity markets.

Gene Tunny  00:16

Welcome to the economics explored podcast, a frank and fearless exploration of important economic issues. I’m your host gene Tunny. I’m a professional economist and former Australian Treasury official. The aim of this show is to help you better understand the big economic issues affecting all our lives. We do this by considering the theory evidence and by hearing a wide range of views. I’m delighted that you can join me for this episode, please check out the show notes for relevant information. Now on to the show. Hello, in this episode, I sit down with former investment banker will Nutting who runs the nuts stock newsletter, who shares his views and where he sees opportunities emerging in 2024. And beyond. Among other things, we talk about gold, uranium, Bitcoin, distressed debt, and even about investments in Russia. You’ll hear Will’s Frank and fearless perspectives on markets and about how paying attention to geopolitics can give investors an edge. What I really like about Will is that he’s contrarian in an intelligent way. As always, when we’re talking about investments, this is all meant to be general information only rather than specific investment or financial advice. If you have any thoughts on what will Orion have to say in this episode, or if you have any ideas about how I can improve the show, then please get in touch. You’ll find my contact details in the show notes. Right. Oh, let’s get into it. I hope you enjoy my conversation with will nothing will not end. Thanks for joining me on the programme. Absolutely. Pleasure. Great to be here. Excellent. Well, well, you’re the author of the nuts, staff newsletter and what are you doing in your newsletter? You’re surveying the global economy, are you?

Will Nutting  01:58

Well, listen, I mean, that stuff started when I worked in their world of investment banking, or well, the broking on the investment banking side. And I got sick to death of ultimately having to retranslate unintelligible conclusion plus politically correct research. And I got to a stage whereby I just thought that the what the investment banks were producing was stuff that was doing anything but giving you an investable conclusion. And it was also perfectly hedged, that no one really came out of it, as I say, with, you know, with with a clear opinion. But I think by nature, I was always reasonably opinionated. I guess from my perspective, you know, I, when I left investment banking, I left broking at the suggestion of a few clients, I set up on my own COVID kind of hit about 12 months later. So suddenly, everybody, suddenly everybody was at home, and no one was in meetings. And that stuff really took off. And I did this as a say, when I worked inside a bunch of us investment banks. And of course, he used to put me head to head with the research departments and the heads of compliance, because very often, I was saying things that I probably shouldn’t have been saying, or I was saying them in a way that maybe I shouldn’t have been saying them. But I think we’ve, I think we’ve got to a world now where if you wake up in the morning, and you watch the BBC, or CNN or Fox, or you watch any network in Australia, and you read a national newspaper, either either, sir, that if that’s your media and your news input, you’re probably never more ignorant than you’ve been in the last 20 or 30 years as to what’s really going on in the world. And so not stuff came about as as really to try and have me doing my curated sources that I built up over 30 years where I really felt that I had a line into whether it be stuff going on in China, whether it be stuff going on in Ukraine, whether it be stuff going on in the Middle East, whether it be stuff going on in markets, I felt that if I had a curated bunch of contacts, who I knew themselves was much of truth seekers as I was, we will be able to put together a network or a platform whereby when we discuss subjects, and we try to do a curated narrative of the market, what’s going on in the market, where the world is going, why things are actually even happening in the world today, which we can talk about. When you got out the other end, you’ve got something that was readable. And that kind of connected the real world and the financial world. And so if you were sitting at home, trying to run your portfolio, or you’re time poor, and you’re trying to run your business, and you’re having a quick look at your investments, when you end up sitting down with a guy that manages your money or you end up sitting down with yourself managing your own money, you actually have a tool that hits your inbox a couple of times a week that actually really points out some of the anomalies but it also does the so what on markets because you know, we can talk about all this stuff and you know, if we woke up tomorrow Morning, I found that we had a, we had a peace treaty in Ukraine. We had a ceasefire in Ukraine. I guess the key question to ask is, how does that make you think differently about portfolios positioning? What would you own? What would you sell? Probably more importantly, and how would that change your bias as to how you would look into 2024? So I get a lot of this kind of stuff, you know, and as I say, it’s not just me, I have some extraordinarily talented and interesting inputs, which is to say, I’ve built up over nearly 30 years of doing this.

Gene Tunny  05:30

Gotcha. Okay. Just a couple of questions based on that will, which investment banks have you worked for or worked with?

Will Nutting  05:42

So I was so I know, I started my life at Fleming’s, which was a UK or Scottish actually investment bank that got ended up being bought by JP Morgan, doing Japan, which was pretty, pretty soon after I left the military as a soldier. I then to be honest, didn’t find a natural gravitation towards Japan. And I did to the US. So then I ended up going to work for Cowen, which was a Boston based investment, and they got bought by sock Jen. And then I went from Cowan, to, to Bank of America, while to Montgomery, actually, which ended up being bought by Bank of America. That was a West Coast technology house. And we did a lot of West Coast, West Coast growth, sort of growth, investing. And then I went from Bank of America, Lehman. And then I was at Lehman for five and a half years, I thankfully left before they disappeared in a puff of smoke. And I ended up in two or three other investment banks. So the last one I ended up doing was, was a steeple. Which, which is a regional regional investment bank in the States. So I always had a big bias to the US. But in a lot of the global investment banks that I work for, I always realised it was a relative game. And so I would always look at, you know, whether that was the rest of the world, European, Asian, UK equivalent stock sometimes to play a similar theme. Yeah,

Gene Tunny  07:05

gotcha. You mentioned that you thought that some of the analysis coming out of investment banks or analysis in the media is not telling you the full story. And you thought you could add, you could provide a better perspective, what do you think they’re missing? Do you have any examples of where you think that analysis has been deficient? And how have you improved on it? Do you have any examples of that? Well?

Will Nutting  07:34

Well, I think there’s, I think there’s a whole bunch of different areas. The first one, I would say, is that, I think a lot of the alpha that you can make, and maybe this isn’t necessarily Alpha inside the big index positions in markets, but a lot of the pure equity alpha you can make, you can make from frankly, just being contrarian and being brave. And so an example I would have of that as we were looking at the the, the sort of the craziness in ESG and the illogicality of a lot of the s ESG. Well, three years ago, and we picked up on a big theme and coal. There were no investment banks had coal analysts anymore, in the same way that hardly any investment banks, heavy heavy cannabis or marijuana analysts anymore. And we looked at an opportunity in coal, we saw how small the market capitalizations were, and we thought these companies and these stocks are not going anywhere. All they’re doing below the radar screen is paying down debt. And they’re ludicrously cheap. They’re ludicrously unloved. And when everyone hates something, it must go up. And when everyone loves something, it must go down. So it was a simple investment metric of becoming quite well known for doing a lot of work on, on on coal stocks. So I guess, inside investment banks, there was a lack of bravery. There was a there was a cow tearing to oh, gosh, evil coal, coals bad. But the perverseness of thinking that coal is bad, but somehow lithium mining and copper mining is all done with people wrapped in cotton wool in nice fluffy places is madness. So it was the double standards of a lot of corporate policy towards which companies and which industries you can cover. So while I guess it’s the lack of bravery, and a lot of the people use the expression woke I think woke is a bit of an over simplistic way. But I think it was, as I say, it was a lot of selectivity in wanting to be seen to be doing the right thing. And I’ve always thought that, you know, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. So, that was the, that was the metric on which we started to look at some of the, you know, uncovered areas. I think just in general with equity research, you know, having a view and having an opinion, that goes against the establishment, you know, was is a very difficult thing for most people to stomach. And I obviously talked about the geopolitics and the politics quite a lot because I think it It matters as to markets today. So I got a very resolute view on Ukraine, which was behind the tragedy, there was no possible way Ukraine was was going to be was going to be Russia and a fair fight. I wrote very early, it was David and Goliath. And you know, and David had a chance against Goliath. But, you know, once he ran out of stones, you know, he was never going to be Goliath. And I think what we’ve seen, even in the last 24 hours, with with Putin has been a lightning flash visit to to, to Abu Dhabi, and now in Saudi is the ramifications of that are that, you know, the world is completely and utterly misread what has gone on in Ukraine and where that’s going to go. So I think that’s obviously something that, you know, as we’ve been very resolute on the Middle East, to be honest, I’ve, I’ve stood back from. But the somatic that I’ve had for the last two and a half years, was a world of a rise of the oppressed and the revenge of the colonised. And I guess that was my sense that we were in a three to five year secular move, where the West has got all the entitlements, and all the debt, and all the arrogance, and the emerging markets. And the global South, because of the ubiquity of a lot of us technology, have had their eyes open to the fact that they’ve been oppressed and exploited by the West for many, many years. And that is gradually coming to an end. Now that has ramifications for a dollarized world that has massive ramifications for countries in Central Africa, which, you know, most people couldn’t put up, put on a map, but look at what’s going on in Niger, who suddenly woke up, you know, Mr. Macron, in France suddenly woke up one day when Niger had a coup, and realised one, the CFA franc was going to come to an end and Niger. Secondly, he was suddenly not going to end up with any uranium for his nuclear power stations. So again, that’s how the geopolitics plays into the market. And, you know, the, the ESG new energy world. So I guess, you know, they’re just a few examples of things that I kick around and look at. But as I say, the the overall sense to me is that you’ve got a bucket of market capitalization. In seven, seven US stocks, a lot of luxury stocks in Europe, a few selective stocks in the UK. And the opposite end of the market, you’ve got lots of short classes of potentially really, really exciting areas of alpha, if you’re willing to really go and kick the tires and the equity while in the equity world. And so I want to have a keeper first in the big stocks, because I think you need to do that from the perspective of staying relevant to index fund managers. But so people who actually, you know, can open their eyes and go and look at what’s going on in the world. There’s, there’s never been a more exciting time to my mind to make money in equity markets.

Gene Tunny  13:09

Right. Okay. Okay. Very good. Now, can I ask you about, you mentioned about Ukraine. And so Putin has been in the Middle East? And I think you were saying that? I can’t remember the the words exactly. But it is there going to be a peace treaty there? Or is there going to be some sort of deal cut in between Russia and Ukraine? Is that Is that what you’re suggesting? Is that going to happen? And basically, Ukraine is going to surrender some territory?

Will Nutting  13:40

I don’t know when I don’t know what my timing. My suspicion is that the timing is much sooner than anyone thinks. I think I write that the head of the US the head of the Russian military, and head of the Ukraine military both share the same Christian name, which is Valerie. I’m not I think it’s spelt in a rational way, not in a not in a Western way. But I think what I’m what I’m being told, and what I understand is that there are ongoing conversations at the moment, and they are effectively deliberating over really three things, which is, you know, the location location of talks, the way in which elections would be would be conducted. And three, who would actually well, I guess, for really, who would be the the arbitrator of that, which I think probably it would be Modi in India, Modi’s probably trod a more neutral path on Russia, Ukraine than any of the major countries. And and then I guess it’s the the nature and relationship of Ukraine with with joining NATO, but I just say I don’t, I think what we’ve ended up doing, if you think simplistically, Nixon and Kissinger spent many, many years, ensuring that China and Russia stayed well apart so that we didn’t get sandwiched in the middle. And what Mr. Biden and his friends and Mr. Johnson and everyone else have done in their wisdom is they’ve ultimately pushed the Russian bride into the arms of the Chinese bridegroom. And when you look at the reciprocity between Russia and China, and you look, I think I heard levens and gave say this, he made a very good point, which is that Russia have everything that China don’t have in China, really, the Russians don’t have. So really, the two fits together, conceptually on paper incredibly well, apart from the fact that I don’t think the natural bias for middle class Russians, is to want to go to China any more than the natural bias from it’ll cause Chinese to stay in China, I think they want to go to the west, they want to do Western things. Exactly the same thing applies in Saudi Arabia, you know, to to to people in Saudi Arabia. So I think that, what we need to do is we need to have a weenie if anyone needs to have regime change, we need a regime change in the West. And the regime change in the West needs to realise that Russia is a is a is a collection of states and countries that have 11 of the world’s 24 time zones. This is a massive, massive landmass of hugely diverse cultures, and to wish for the destruction of Russia to wish for a maimed and angry Russian buffalo is to see massive instability in the world. And so to my mind, a Western rapprochement with with Russia, is desired. And I think the to go back to The David and Goliath analogy, I think it’s very real, to my mind, that you will see more signs of of a peace treaty between Russia and new between Russia and Ukraine, I think sooner rather than later. And I always I’ve always said, and I’m not original in saying this, as you know, as soon as the money runs out, the world will move on, or, you know, middle class England and middle class America all have flagpoles. And, you know, they just it’s like a semaphore competition. You know, it’s the Ukraine flag one day, it’s the Palestinian flag the next day, the Israeli flag, the next you know, it’s who can put flags up and down. And it’s very fickle, and it’s very fast moving. And the world will move on very quickly, tragically, to to the next complex, which by the way, might be in a might be Guyana, next quarter, Venezuela, for example.

Gene Tunny  17:30

Yeah, yeah, I’ve been, I’ve been following that. Now, do you think that the West will, or the United States and Britain will try to, you know, it’ll try to repair its relationship with Russia so that it splits? It doesn’t have Russia and China in a block against it? Is that the suggestion? Is that what your is that your best?

Will Nutting  18:02

I think it goes back to the to the point, which is that if you’re sitting in the UK, you’re you’re sitting in the US, and you have a pragmatic view about where you are at in your, you know, take the Ottoman Empire kind of equivalent analysis, right. All the Holy Roman Empire, where are you? As I say, you’ve got I mean, I looked at the I was watching the the presidential debates that the leadership debates in the US last night, I mean, and the level of rudeness and offensiveness and unpleasantness it, it just plums new debt. So, you know, we live in a society now that is so disrespectful of institutions. And there’s a reason for that. The institutions have a lot to bear for that. Secondly, again, we have massive indebtedness, huge amounts of entitlement. And also, we have all the old people. And it’s an unpopular thing to say, but, you know, can we afford to continue to support, you know, the elderly populations that we do? And the answer is probably not, but no one’s willing to have that conversation, you know, politically, because it’s certainly in the UK, UK, politics is probably the same in Australia, you know, you know, the grey vote is been the vote that politicians have been trying to bribe and try and get hold on. So, for me, it’s a it’s a case of evolve or die in western case. And I’m not saying it’s in the next 12 months. But if you look at the history of the last 20 years, and look at all the conflicts that you know, we’ve been involved in, as we’ve obviously follow the US into a lot of these conflicts and in good faith. You know, that was all great when money was free. When money when we were waging a few wars in Afghanistan and places that most Americans and most Brits couldn’t put on a map. It was all great. But you suddenly take the cost of money from costing nothing to positive real rates. And you’ve got a completely and utterly different world to play with, you know? And not only are you seeing that emerging in the world of private equity, those people that, you know, that walked on water and could do no wrong, you know, look at the look at the look at the performance numbers in that industry, if you actually really break out the numbers for those funds since inception. So, when I look at it, as I say, I just think I think the world is changing. And if I was sitting there, and talking to, as I do on occasions, talk to politicians, it’s understanding that it is a case of evolve or die in many respects.

Gene Tunny  20:37

Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Can I ask you about the Middle East? What? What are your thoughts on? What will happen there? Is there still a risk of a wider regional conflict involving Iran, involving other states in the Middle East?

Will Nutting  20:56

I don’t know that I have a greater perspective on this than anyone else. I mean, I was horrified by, you know, we’ve all seen the equivalency of the equivalency of what went on the seventh of October would have been, you know, the IRA in the UK, killing 9000 people, we can do all these analogies, and I’m not going to get taken down down a rabbit hole there. You know, I go back to the end of the Ottoman Empire in the in the 20s. I go back to Sykes Pico, when, you know, Frenchman, and an Englishman sat down with a crayon, probably with a glass of port and drew up the lines of the Middle East. But I guess when I stand back, and I take away, you know, go back to a time when these countries didn’t exist. And try and look at the true history of this. And then fast forward to where we are today. I think it’s incredibly difficult to see how a two state solution exists in the Middle East, and how we get to that stage. But again, I think what we’ve got to have is we’ve got to have leaders in the West, who have an interest in not accelerating and not exacerbating these conflicts. And I think we need to try and find a way of of dealing with this, you know, because the optics of the world looks at what’s going on in the Middle East. And as shocked as they are by what happened on the seventh of October. I think they’re also looking and saying maybe there is a an unacceptable civilian civilian casualty rate to the operations that are going on at the moment. So as I say, I mean, your guess is as good as mine, when it comes to Iran. I think I think the Iranian leader is I think he’s visited increasing in Moscow today. I mean, Iran seem to be, you know, seem to be very quietly, obviously playing a, you know, a very, very strong game here, you know. But as I say, I don’t want to even think about escalation at the moment. And I’m hoping that, you know, I hope that cooler heads can prevail.

Gene Tunny  22:57

Okay, we’ll take a short break here for a word from our sponsor.

Female speaker  23:03

If you need to crunch the numbers, then get in touch with adept economics. We offer you Frank and fearless economic analysis and advice, we can help you with funding submissions, cost benefit analysis, studies, and economic modelling of all sorts. Our head office is in Brisbane, Australia, but we work all over the world, you can get in touch via our website, www dot adapt economics.com.au. We’d love to hear from you.

Gene Tunny  23:32

Now back to the show. So I guess what I’m interested in well, is to what extent are you factoring in these geopolitical risks going forward, such as you know, what’s happening in Ukraine, although it sounds like that sort of, that may not be a big factor in the future, given that there could be some sort of a deal? What could happen in the Middle East? And also in China, Taiwan? Is that is that a risk? To what extent are you factoring these potential? What would you call them zones of conflict or flash points into your investment recommendations?

Will Nutting  24:19

So I run the cyber sort of this little farm, this little portfolio that I publish every Monday and it’s, it’s, it’s got a few million dollars in it, and it’s, it’s a small amount of people’s money, it’s not open to external investors, and I don’t want to be a fund manager. But what I do want to do is to see that people see that I eat my own cooking, and I reflect, you know, I reflect my my thoughts and my ideas in six or seven key Cymatics we have a macro overlay thematics we use a bunch of ETFs to ultimately just reflect where we think the interesting parts of the world are. And then obviously, we have six kind of key Cymatics like global digital infrastructure and energy But infrastructure and stuff like that. So so it’s a fairly simple logical portfolio. As I said, factoring these thematics in Yes, I do. But But conversely, we sold out of most of our US defence stocks seven or eight months ago. By way of example, you know, we still have a some exposure to, to fertiliser, so, you know, feed the world. But on the whole, you know, I don’t, you know, I’m very, I’m very selective on, you know, trying to play the kind of war in conflict trade inside equities, because I think the market gets, you know, the market gets pretty savvy with it. We still own big systems in the UK, we’ve owned, we own some dividends, Ryan Mattel in Europe. But I think, you know, if you looked at the defence stocks as an example of what you are what you asked me, I think what we’re discovering now, as even the nature of warfare is changing. And, you know, though, these defence platforms are vital and hugely important. And whether it be aircraft carriers, F 20, twos, F 30, fives, multibillion dollar incredible aircraft, you know, also low level, you know, almost analogue warfare, when it comes down to drones, etc, you know, is something that the world is waking up to, you know, I’ve got an, you know, I’ve got an aircraft carrier, and you’ve got 50,000, you know, I’ll raise you your aircraft carrier to 50,000 drones. Now, you know, I’m sure that a state of the art aircraft carrier has the technology to repel drones. But I suspect if there’s a really concerted drone strike on a on a carrier group, you could probably inflict some, some fairly cataclysmic losses. So to me things like the thick of things like the the defence sector is much more important than, Oh, gosh, we live in and we live in a world, you know, let’s just blindly go and own defence stocks, oh, gosh, we live in a high conflict world, let’s blatantly just go no, no oil stocks, you know, I prefer the capital spending infrastructure, infrastructure cycle type names, you know. So when it comes to energy, I like infrastructure, I like uranium has been a still a huge and has been a big focus of mine for the last three years. I like offshore drilling. I like the lateral businesses to offshore drilling. Where you’ve also got, you know, huge cash generation and debt being paid down and such. So we’re pretty selective actually, about how we, how we play those thematics inside portfolio. The portfolio? Yeah.

Gene Tunny  27:39

Fair enough. Can I ask you about uranium? So are you do you think we will, there’ll be a resurgence in demand or a resurgence of investment in nuclear power? Is that what you’re projecting?

Will Nutting  27:55

Uranium is? I hate you know, I hate to say things are that simple, but to my mind, uranium is the is the is that it’s, it’s a simpler supply demand story, as I’ve seen, in my 30 years of doing this, you know, you’ve got, you know, 150 100 60 million pounds of production, you know, you’ve got children terminan of demand, if you if you use an analogy of oil with those numbers, it will be the entire focus of the world on the deficit in on the deficit in oil. You know, I mean, I think it’s 25% of US electricity production comes from from from from nuclear. And also, it’s not just a case of digging uranium out of the ground, putting on a truck, driving it to a power station, and loading it into a furnace, you know, you’ve got to actually process the uranium, you’ve got to produce the fuel rods, there’s a huge bottleneck. So there’s been a complete lack of capital spending in the uranium space, because there’s been a complete lack of capital spending in the energy bridge. And I guess I want to divert to this and just say that, when you look at energy policy and energy spending, you know, I think if we were sitting down with 20 year olds or our children and explaining the world we want to get to, in terms of energy, the other side of the chasm. I think we all kind of know what that looks like with wind, wave, solar, etc. But we have to supply and we have to, we have to provide baseload power, and baseload power. When you think about the energy bridge from the Old World to the New World, is, unfortunately, a lot of fossil fuels. And it’s going to be a lot of fossil fuels for the foreseeable future, which is why met coal is still a hugely exciting space. But when it comes back to Uranium, again, uranium is an area where it is the lowest cost the lowest cost electricity apart from hydro and utilities, have completely and utterly under understood went on shoring up their supplies, and then load on that the unknown quantity of small modular reactors coming into the market. I just think you’ve got a tremendous call option. The only thing that surprised me about uranium is one, how tiny the market capitalization is. So for most index players, it’s kind of irrelevant. Don’t talk to me about uranium. I mean, I can’t even I can’t even think about it. It’s not It’s nowhere in my index benchmark, apart from Cameco, that’s about the only stock that I think has any kind of relevance to people. But I think for anyone who’s smart, and actually tries to look at where the world’s going, I’m surprised that uranium isn’t $150 upon.

Gene Tunny  30:45

Right, gotcha. Okay. Okay. And you mentioned offshore drilling. So this is consistent with your, your expectation that we’re still going to be relying on fossil fuels for several decades into the future. So I suppose that yeah, that makes sense. It is, it is. And I,

Will Nutting  31:08

when I try it, when I try to think about energy transition, and energy position and energy policy, it kind of takes me back to school prize giving. And it makes me think, you looked at me strangely, and I know

Gene Tunny  31:23

that I was just thinking, I mean, it’s a very, it’s a very British thing, isn’t it? The school, the school prizes I was thinking of? There’s a great Jeeves and Wooster story with the prizes, but we won’t divert on to that. But go ahead, go ahead.

Will Nutting  31:38

So that the words think about it is that it’s about the ESG Industry and Energy Policy, which is that, yes, the industry and the whole environmental policy, what it’s done is it’s continued to reward. The, you know, the nerdy kid at school with the pedal back pedal that crosses, he was super bright, who always won the science prize, okay, from day one, continually given the science prize. To me, that’s the green energy company, they were they started good, they stayed good. And they got even better at being good. The problem is that the most exciting and most interesting price to reward at school price giving was a really badly behaved hit the big kid who had a real presence at school, who was the badly behaved, disruptive guy who was running around making a mess everywhere, causing damage, doing bad things to other kids who suddenly became a better behaved kid. And you can then give them the price of being better behaved. So when I look at energy, and that’s the brown energy companies, that’s the occidental is that the Exxon Mobil? That’s the BPS? That’s the Australian equivalents. It’s, you know, whoever it is. And so I think, if only governments and if only investors and investment mandates could take a look at these companies and say, right, you know, what, we need to start rewarding the businesses here, that kind of do a better job of evolving, not only is it going to be a good thing to attract capital back into these companies, who can continue to invest in the energy bridge, as I, as I, as I call it, you know, but also, I think it’s, it’s just going to send the right message to the industry. So again, I I’m not, I’m not a climate denier, I’m not an ESG dislike or hater, I’m just a pragmatist. And so I think that the second wave of ESG, whatever, however it looks, that will probably evolve in the next, you know, one to five years, I think it’s going to be much more joined up thinking much more honest, and much more realistic. And so, as I say, I think you know, the cop boondoggles of the last few years, you know, the latest one we had last week, I think just I think we’ve seen Peak Peak nonsense, and I think, peaking ESG and as peak climate nonsense, dissipates, I think some really interesting investment opportunities will come out the other side of it.

Gene Tunny  33:59

Okay, okay. Very good. I liked how you described the you’re talking about the shot glasses before you wanted to have some shot glasses? What’s in your shot glasses at the moment? Well, can you give us some idea of what those those are they? Are they speculative investments, how would you describe them? Well, I

Will Nutting  34:25

think so. I guess just to paint a scenario for this. The I don’t know what the data is, but probably over 90% of equity. Investing is passive. So let them take it that it’s passive funds, it’s machines. It’s it’s quants, it’s everything else. So what’s left over at the end of the day, is either you as a retail investor or as a you know, as an active investor scrabbling around saying, Have I got an edge on Microsoft have I got an edge on? Can I come over? Do I have an edge on Palantir eran AMD versus owning and video to get my exposure to artificial intelligence. Am I the smart? Am I smart enough to have worked out that IBM as a forgotten as a forgotten cap, a technology mega cap might actually have technology, I might actually be really, really relevant to AI, I could the AI Halo suddenly shine above AB IBM, which is what you’re seeing happening at the moment, for example. Now, I talked about some of this stuff, and I write about it. And I’m hugely focused on it because it’s hugely relevant for alpha and for performance. So I view those as the kind of buckets or those the buckets of market capitalization. What’s really interesting is in small cap and mid cap world up until about three weeks ago, it was literally like all the pint mugs in the world and disappeared, you know, and it was either as I say, a bucket or as a shot class. And the shot glass is all the all the tiny stuff. So a lot of it as I say it’s uranium stocks, its offshore oil stocks. It’s, you know, the old gold stock, its coal, its special situation, things that we have an healthcare like, really interesting company called cardio that deals with the some of the aftermath of COVID vaccines with pericarditis and myocarditis. It’s a it’s a gold company that has a hidden uranium company inside it that we look at and focus on a lot. I’ve said coal already. It’s tankers, some tanker stocks, you know, if you look at what’s going on in Panama, and look at what’s going on was in potentially in the Suez Canal, you’re beginning to see new tankers are not being built. You’re now actually seeing some tankers having to go round the whole south coast of America without going through the Panama Canal. Think about what that does to day rates on tankers, etc. It’s Kryptos. I have a positive, a cynical, I 55 years old, right? So I’m kind of a middle aged, middle aged white guy, with a with a natural cynicism towards tattoos, ponytails and people talking to me about crypto. But I’ve absolutely right that we absolutely own it and invest in it. And and I think that some really interesting, fascinating trends. And the final thing I can say to you, is we also cannabis and marijuana stocks, which remind me of kind of coal in 2020. We have we have some positions there as well. Yeah,

Gene Tunny  37:25

yeah. Very good. With the crypto. You mentioned that there are some trends that you’re you’re excited about, what are those with crypto?

Will Nutting  37:37

Well, I think to be to be positive about to be really positive about crypto, and to ripoff, the, the the cynicism that you see out there of it doesn’t really solve any problem. It’s, you know, it’s it’s the currency of criminals and perverts and, and, you know, weirdos, I think you have to get your head out of the developed West and go into emerging markets and go to the spec is done Korea, Stan, you know, and actually see how people use crypto see how people are entirely comfortable with having crypto wallets, see how people use crypto as as accurate as a security for loans in the same way that, you know, crowd funding has worked in the West. And so as I say, I think when I look at the risk reward on crypto when I look at Kryptos, entire market cap still being about 1/10 out of gold. And I look at the usability of crypto and how I see crypto developing that usability. And I think I’m right saying there’s 22 about 22,600 Different Kryptos but 53 or 54% of Kryptos market cap is basically and effectively Bitcoin and Aetherium you know, so to me, I think, you know, if you don’t own Bitcoin, or you don’t own Aetherium, or synthetics or any kind of defy plays, and you’re sitting in front of grown up investors, I think you better have a really, really good reason why you don’t you better own lots of gold as an alternative. And I’d suggest that if you actually get on a plane and go and travel to the global South, the parts of the world that are growing really fast, with dynamic young populations, without old people without entitlement, and with no debt. You’ll come back feeling a whole bunch more about crypto than you would if you’re sitting in your office in Mayfair or Washington.

Gene Tunny  39:42

Yeah, yeah. Okay. Okay. Now, what’s your process for, for getting these insights? So you mentioned you’ve got a you’ve got an extensive network, have you got a team working for you?

Will Nutting  39:55

So we have I mean, we, in terms of kind of, you know, full time employees as basically as effectively, we’re pretty much a team of two in terms of actually running the business on a day to day basis. But I have about five people who some are all clients of mine, some of the people I’ve known for many years, who, on the whole, we’re all super successful, overtired. And all living in interesting parts of the world, and all doing really interesting things. But also, they massively wanted to keep their head, their head in the game in terms of markets, and macro and geopolitics, something else. And so what happens is that, you know, a little bit like having a research department, you know, if I want to, if I want to look at global video games, or I want to look at Coal, I want to look at tankers. I have my own go to sources where I would go to, you know, we’re not writing, probably writing a five page report. To my mind, what I’m trying to do, and that stuff is to make people question make, make, make people think, on occasions, make people laugh, and try and make or save your money. And so these sources, and these, these people that kind of work with us, our partners, if you like, are just incredibly useful as one as kind of sounding boards, but also as amazing sources of perspective and information. And, you know, they are on the whole, you know, in some respects, just trying to do what I’m trying to do, which is to home, you know that that truth seekers they are. And they’re, they’re realists and pragmatists in terms of how they look at the world. So we have, you know, regular conference calls, we have regular brainstorming sessions every week. And so I have a really good, experienced team that I kind of a second check on me. And on occasions, you know, we’ll sit on a call and I’ll go on, am I completely off the wall on this on? Am I am I? Am I mad thinking, thinking about this in this way? You know, how? And then the other question, I guess I ask is, how consensus? Am I is everyone else talking about this? Because if everyone else is talking about something, or everyone else is focused on something, you know, I don’t want to be the last guy at the party drinking the mind sweeping the drinks, you know, you know, I want to be the kind of first guy at the party and I don’t really mind if, you know, I’ve got to make small talk with, you know, with the granny, you know, until the fun people turn up. Yeah.

Gene Tunny  42:18

Okay. And so who’s your newsletter pitch that will? So I mean, you mentioned like, you’ve got high net worth individuals. Like, who would who’s going to benefit from this?

Will Nutting  42:33

I think it’s, you know, it’s pitched at it? Well, when you look at the content of it, it’s got a bit of everything for everybody, because it’s got some thought provoking stuff on the geopolitics side, it’s got some real world stuff that, you know, I just pick up from people sending stuff to me, and, you know, I scrape batter, you know, meet other media stuff and such, like, you know, but on the whole, if you’re time poor, if you’re intellectually curious, if you have to look at markets, or you have to look, or you have an interest in understanding how the real world meets the financial world, and how that looks, it’s really pitched to anyone in that environment. So, you know, we have anyone from one of the most respected, macro hedge fund managers in the world, who uses it as a, as a real world check. You know, if you, if you sit inside a big New York hedge fund, for example, you know, 90% of your employees probably going to chauffeur driven car to work, they get a chauffeur driven car home, you know, they, half of them were a lot of them fly privately, you know, they have restaurant quality food delivered to their desk. And, you know, it’s such like, most of them don’t even ever look out the window, and actually go and look at what’s going on in the world, you know? And so we’re kind of a reality check. We’re a real world reality check as to look at this. Have you thought about that? And as I say, Well, anyone who receives that stuff really, as somebody who’s who’s intellectually curious, and all we’re trying to do, I think, is to make people feel and look a little bit smarter about a whole bunch of subjects. And the process. What I love about it is there’s a huge reciprocity, which is that peep, I get a normal amount of feedback from people. And so if I’m really, if I’m really taking an aggressive stance on something political or geopolitical or something about the market, you know, it’s very interesting to me to know how much pushback I get and who gives me that pushback. But as I say, it’s a hugely broad church from some of the most respected entrepreneurs and investors in the world family offices, but also I have a lot of people’s kids, you know, who’ve left university who’ve been given their first, you know, 20 or 20 or 30 grand, they’ve just started an equity portfolio. And they’re trying to work out, you know, they’re understanding the power of compounding mathematics, and they’re trying to work out what they should own and what they shouldn’t own.

Gene Tunny  45:02

Okay, so it sounds like it is not necessarily out of the out of reach for people who aren’t hedge fund managers, then I’ll put a link in the show notes to it so people can check out the details. Gene, our

Will Nutting  45:19

system is, you know, we give people a month free or whatever it is. And, you know, as I say, I mean, it’s 85 pounds a month is a meaningful, it’s a meaningful investment for a new for, for a letter. But it’s not a newsletter. It’s a facts, ideas and conclusions letter. And so it really does drill down to and give you investable conclusions. And that’s one of the reasons why I think, you know, we charge what we charge is because if you make frankly, one decent investment decision that it pays for itself, you know, hand over fist.

Gene Tunny  45:51

Gotcha. Okay, as global focus, so you’d have a focus on East Asia and Australia. global budget of global focus.

Will Nutting  45:59

Absolutely. And one of the reasons I travel as much as I do, is because I go to, I mean, I can’t tell you how many countries I’ve been to this year. But you know, Namibia and Africa, South Africa, Mozambique. I’ve been all over the stands as Becca Stein, Craig iStan, I’ve been to Panama, I’ve been to Colombia, just to name a few. And when I go there, I don’t just go there to lie on a beach. I go there, and I meet people who run, you know, I’ve wandered around the office base port, the guy who, who, who runs the port in Valencia, Spain, Namibia, understanding what’s going on with oil discovery and infrastructure in the energy and oil business in southwestern Africa. You know, I went and met the guys who run all the all the power transmission business in Namibia as well. And understanding that relationship with what’s going on with South Africa and their power problems in South Africa. So we really do go and meet and try and understand what’s going on in places. And then I’m just looking for those nuggets of interesting stuff to explain to other people why and how those things are happening, but also looking for investment opportunities.

Gene Tunny  47:10

Okay, okay. Very good. Final question. Well, 2020 24, what are you expecting? What do you think? Do you have any ideas on what the what big developments there will be? What are you? How are you positioning yourself for 2024?

Will Nutting  47:28

So I think 2024 if I’m, if I’m, if I’m right, I think there’s a there’s a slim chance that we get an acceleration in in a past acceleration in inflation. But on the whole I, I’m hoping I’m hoping and thinking that the current escalation that we’ve seen in kind of geopolitics comes down. I don’t see China, escalating with Taiwan, I think quite the opposite. So I see some rapprochement of some of the geopolitics. But I also see a big drive to nationalisation. So I think, you know, countries are increasingly going to be looking after themselves, you know, there’s going to be an anti Davos psychology to most to most countries, you know, I think we’re going to be going through this huge election cycles. So I think that’s huge election cycles is going to feed that I think it’s going to feed economic nationalism. You know, when it comes to, you know, I think gold will go higher, I think Bitcoin will go higher. I think Russia will potentially be a really fascinating investment. I think coal alongside uranium will still be great investments, I think oil arguably will still be a very good investment as well. So on the whole I’m still focused on kind of the bottom end of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs pyramid and less focused on the top you know, not saying okay, not saying that we are going to have some incredibly good opportunities and technology and I’m absolutely not the guy tried to write off artificial intelligence. But I do worry that the seven big technology companies in the world it for entitled indebted West that needs to cut debt I do worry that they are such serial underpay as of tax that the potential opportunity for for tax rates to have to go up materially inside these big technology companies. I think to me is a big concern.

Gene Tunny  49:35

Yeah, gotcha. Okay. Okay. Right. Oh, we will not own anything else before we wrap up. This has been terrific. I love your insights into being contrarian how you can benefit from it. I mean, not I mean being contrarian in an intelligent way. I think often there’s a lot of you know, there is contrarian ism and as may not be helpful, but I think you can In contrary and in an intelligent way, and I think you’ve demonstrated that with some very good examples. Any other points before we wrap up?

Will Nutting  50:09

No, I think if I was sitting talking to young people in school, and I didn’t want to talk and kind of financial language, I’d say, I think the kind of the, the Anglo Saxon world needs to get back to its its culture, and its balance, and its realism. And its focus. And I think we need to focus on getting back to our traditional strengths. And I think what’s interesting is, that’s what Russia and China are doing. And I think that when we stand back, and we look at how we’re going to navigate this next very difficult period, you know, of multiculturalism, and everyone having a phone, everyone having an opinion, everyone’s seeing what’s going on in the world unfolding on a daily basis on a screen, you know, I think we’re gonna have to go back to basics, and I think it’s going back to basics in society. And when it comes to investing, it’s going back to basics and investing, which is, you know, free cash flow, you know, you know, low leverage, and me as a shareholder, and an equity holder, getting returns. And if I’m looking at the toxic areas of the market, it’s probably going to be a world where where, you know, distressed debt is going to be a fascinating opportunity. And as well as I think, you know, global macro, it’s not going to be private equity. And it’s probably given its and it’s probably not going to be bonds. But I mean, I’ll let the bond I’ll let that I’ll let the bond guys pontificate on that.

Gene Tunny  51:38

Gotcha. Just before we go, What do you mean, what were you driving out exactly with distressed debt? There? was so I mean, I think what do you have in mind

Will Nutting  51:47

that if I started today, if I, if I started today, I listened to a podcast, um, yesterday with the head of Blackstone’s real estate business, and a lot of the fat not understanding really any of the language that she uses. She sounded to me like, you know, she’d been schooled in the same school that the principles of, of Harvard and Penn University have been schooled in, which is seen in all the news worlds, and I was 20. For us. You know, I, I think that the, the opportunities that have been unlocked in the next two years, as retail investors are kind of locked in the church and, and set fire to, as they have opportunities to go and buy the retail charges of the these big private equity firms offer distressed offerings. I think that if you’re sitting there with a big pile of cash, the opportunity to go and buy, you know, cheap UK assets. But the same way, I think the opportunity to go and buy exposure to very cheap real estate assets is going to be huge. The question for me is, do you want to own the equity? Or do you want to own the debt, and I suspect being as high up the capital structure as possible is where you want to be. And he probably needs it, and you probably want to get paid to wait. So I’m going to imagine that I think the debt side is more interesting than the equity side. Okay,

Gene Tunny  53:12

okay. Gotcha. Right. Oh, well, not. This has been fascinating. I really appreciate your insights. I will put a link in the show notes to not stuff and yeah, I encourage. If you’re listening in the audience, and you like what we’ll have to say, then yeah, definitely check that out. I think it’s, it sounds like you got a great process. There will end. Yeah, I really enjoyed your insight. So thanks so much again, for your time. Obviously,

Will Nutting  53:42

we can sign you know, we can we can sign people up for it. We give people a month or a couple of months for free. And you know, that we can work on that basis. But listen, thanks so much. Really, really enjoyed it.

Gene Tunny  53:53

Excellent. Thanks so much. Well, alright.

Will Nutting  53:55

Thanks a lot.

Gene Tunny  53:58

rato thanks for listening to this episode of economics explored. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please get in touch. I’d love to hear from you. You can send me an email via contact at economics explore.com Or a voicemail via SpeakPipe. You can find the link in the show notes. If you’ve enjoyed the show, I’d be grateful if you could tell anyone you think would be interested about it. Word of mouth is one of the main ways that people learn about the show. Finally, if your podcasting app lets you then please write a review and leave a rating. Thanks for listening. I hope you can join me again next week.

54:45

Thank you for listening. We hope you enjoyed the episode. For more content like this where to begin your own podcasting journey head on over to obsidian-productions.com

Credits

Thanks to Obsidian Productions for mixing the episode and to the show’s sponsor, Gene’s consultancy business www.adepteconomics.com.au. Full transcripts are available a few days after the episode is first published at www.economicsexplored.com.

Economics Explored is available via Apple PodcastsGoogle Podcast, and other podcasting platforms.

Categories
Podcast episode

Investing for success w/ Paul Mladjenovic, author of Stock Investing for Dummies

Paul Mladjenovic, CFP is the author or co-author of several dummies guides on investing, including Stock Investing for Dummies and Investing in Gold and Silver for Dummies. Paul shares his views on what makes for successful investing with show host Gene Tunny in episode 133 of Economics Explored. They discuss what types of companies to look for, an often unappreciated benefit of investing in gold and silver, and what Paul thinks about real estate and crypto assets.

You can listen to the conversation using the embedded player below or via Google PodcastsApple PodcastsSpotify, and Stitcher, among other podcast apps.

This episode contains general information only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Please consult a financial planning professional for advice specific to your circumstances.

About this episode’s guest – Paul Mladjenovic

Paul Mladjenovic, CFP, is a certified financial planner practitioner, writer, and speaker. He has helped people with their financial and business concerns since 1981. You can learn more about him at ravingcapitalist.com. He has authored or co-authored several popular Dummies guides on investing and affiliate marketing. You can learn more about Paul and his online courses at https://www.ravingcapitalist.com/

Links relevant to the conversation

Some of Paul’s books mentioned this episode:

Stock Investing For Dummies

Investing in Gold & Silver For Dummies

Transcript of EP133 – Investing for success w/ Paul Mladjenovic

N.B. This is a lightly edited version of a transcript originally created using the AI application otter.ai. It may not be 100 percent accurate, but should be pretty close. If you’d like to quote from it, please check the quoted segment in the recording.

Gene Tunny  00:01

Coming up on Economics Explored.

Paul Mladjenovic  00:04

The bottom line is, Gene, is that healthy quality companies will keep zigzagging upward no matter what you throw at them.

Gene Tunny  00:13

Welcome to the Economics Explored podcast, a frank and fearless exploration of important economic issues. I’m your host, Gene Tunny. I’m a professional economist based in Brisbane, Australia, and I’m a former Australian Treasury official. This is Episode 133, on investing for success. My guest this episode is the author of several of those yellow dummies guide that you may have seen in bookstores, Paul Mladjenovic. He’s written Stock Investing for Dummies, High Level Investing for Dummies, and Investing in Gold and Silver for Dummies, among other books. Paul Mladjenovic, CFP is a certified financial planner, practitioner, writer and speaker. He has helped people with their financial and business concerns since 1981. You can learn more about him at ravingcapitalist.com.

The usual disclaimer applies to this episode. This is for general information only, and nothing in this episode should be interpreted as financial or investment advice. Please consult a financial planner for advice specific to your circumstances.

Please check out the show notes for links to materials mentioned in this episode and for any clarifications. Also, check out our website, economicsexplored.com. If you sign up as an email subscriber, you can download my e-book, Top 10 Insights from Economics. So please consider getting on the mailing list. If you have any thoughts on what Paul or what I have to say about investing in this episode, then please let me know. You can either record a voice message via SpeakPipe – see the link in the show notes – or you can email me via contact@economicsexplored.com. I’d love to hear from you. Righto, now for my conversation with Paul Mladjenovic on investing for success. Thanks to my audio engineer, Josh Crotts, for his assistance in producing this episode. I hope you enjoy it. Paul Mladjenovic, welcome to the programme.

Paul Mladjenovic  02:20

Thank you kindly. What a pleasure to be on.

Gene Tunny  02:22

Yes. Thanks, Paul. Yes, it’s good to be chatting with you today about investing. You’ve written several books on investing. One of your books I’ve been reading is Stock Investing for Dummies. I’ve been getting a lot out of that. I think it’s a really great book and has a lot of sensible things to say that are consistent with economics. Really, really positive about that book. I’d like to ask, just to start off with, what is your general approach to investing? Does that vary over the lifecycle? Would you be able to take us through that place?

Paul Mladjenovic  03:04

Oh, absolutely. First of all, as you know, probably one of the most important foundations of investing is good economics. You’re on the right topic in many respects. If people make good choices, and with some economic reasoning, they could prosper, among the many choices you can make out there. And it also depends on many other things, such as politics and that kind of economic environment, etc. For me, I prefer looking through things through the prism of value and fundamental analysis.

Like many folks, when the people who make sense about this, whether it’s economics from that gentleman who’s behind you there, Mr. Friedman, or in my case, somebody more in the narrow vertical of stock investing, someone like Benjamin Graham, who was like the father of value investing. And I think it’s an important concept, because many things have to make sense. In economics, once you understand the basics of your own chequebook and household budget, it’s not that far-fetched to understand choosing good companies to invest in, etc.

I’ve been teaching about investing since the 1980s. I find that if you have common sense and have some basic of economics and grasping long-term success in stock investing and other assets as well, it’s not that difficult. You are much more proficient. It’s when you understand that. Common sense and value, it goes a long way in the world of investing.

Gene Tunny  04:34

Okay, so you’re looking for companies that are reliable over the long term. Am I reading that right?

Paul Mladjenovic  04:46

Absolutely. Actually, I’ll give you a few points from my investing class that I love. You’re a very astute man, and the people in many of my classes, many of them are beginners or beginning intermediates, and the first thing I tell them is, select… I say, remember two words, when you’re choosing your investments, whether it’s directly in stocks, or indirectly through ETFs and mutual funds, two words, human need. Think about all the products and services people will keep on buying, no matter how good or bad the economy is. And I think that especially for beginners who are looking for long-term success, human need will really, I think, crystallise it very much for folks moving forward.

For example, some of the greatest companies in the last 20 years that have been chugging along, no matter what, with the crises and market crashes and booms and busts and all the rest, companies that are profitable, involved in things such as food, water, beverage, utilities, etc. This is where you start. You start with human need before you start going into other pursuits, such as growth investing, or speculating, or everything else for that matter. The first thing is get to the right category.

The second thing is, I look for companies that are profitable and have low debt. Those may sound common sense to maybe folks like you and I, but when I’ve seen the kind of selections people have made for their portfolios over the last, I don’t know, ever since I’ve started teaching, my eyes bug out. People go for the flashy stocks, big names, glamour headlines, and that kind of thing. Those stocks may go up or down in a short term. But if they don’t have star power, in terms of their fundamentals, good profitability that they’ve done year in and year out profitable… Very important.

To me, profit isn’t just a cornerstone of a good stock. I can make the argument that it’s the cornerstone of a successful economy. I was born in a communist country. They obliterated the concept of profit, which means you obliterate the incentive to produce. That’s why you invest in companies because these produce goods and services. That’s the hallmark of a successful company, so profitability.

Again, anybody in our audience, you look at your own budget, what do you look at? If your income is greater than your expenses, you’re doing fine, especially whether you’re a billion-dollar company, or you’re a household budget. That’s one aspect of it. The second one is I like companies that have good balance sheet. And again, assets exceeding liabilities, it doesn’t have to be complicated. Many people think when you’re looking at stock investing, you have to have a degree from the Wall Street school of analysis, but no. A lot of them have gone wrong, because they went beyond the scope of good economics and good common sense.

Those are the things I look for, human need, profitability, do they have good balance sheets, in other words, making sure they’re not overloaded with debt, etc. Of course, they have to be in a free market economy, because obviously, the free market is a very important and very powerful part of any successful economy out there. Beyond that, I look at other things as well, does it pay dividends and so forth.

A lot of these things, obviously, I detail that in my book, Stock Investing for Dummies. I try to also crystallise that in my courses online, etc, whenever I’m doing live programmes or recorded, because I think people, I don’t know, to me, the more they understand about good investing and their own situation, the better choices they make, not only for their portfolios, but also when they walk into the voting booth, believe it or not. I feel that’s part of it. People forget that during the Great Depression of the 1930s, people forget that many people unwittingly voted for the Great Depression, because they voted for policies,  because they didn’t understand economics, and those in turn, created just wretched conditions in many respects. But anyway, on to your other points, my friend.

Gene Tunny  09:09

I’m interested in this concept you mentioned, value investing. That’s contrasted with what’s called growth investing, if I remember correctly. This is one of the things you write about in the book. Would you be able to explain what those differences are, please, Paul?

Paul Mladjenovic  09:28

Well, value investing means that you’re not going to be putting your money into a company that’s overvalued right now. And how do we mean about valuation? You see, when people are buying a stock, they’re buying the company, and if they’re buying a stock that’s very overvalued, then you have less chance for it to grow or do well over the long term. You’ve seen that happen very frequently. I look for something like is it a fair valuation, because I can look at a company and see things like its book value, the price-to-earnings ratio. Again, I’m happy to explain all of these to folks that need it. But there are some very key ratios that tell you if you’re paying too much.

How often have people saw a company that was say losing money, but it had a very hot sexy technology, people kept on bidding up the stock, bidding up the stock, and all of a sudden, you’re paying a fortune for a company that’s not making a profit, which means that the moment the economy starts to get a little bit worrisome, unstable, recessionary, these are among the first that that see that stocks fall. If people are paying a fair amount for the company itself…

Here in 2022, it isn’t like the way it was when I first started investing. You had to go to the library and dig through 27-pound books just to find some of the right numbers. But now you’re online and on your smartphone, and you can find out the key numbers and the key metrics very quickly. And so it should be easier than ever before. But I think people get waylaid because they see all the financial commentators and everybody is… There’s that sales pitch from Wall Street, etc. But my thing is, you always go back, the way you look at the ingredients of a good recipe, you look at the ingredients of a good company, and then say to yourself… One of the things I mentioned was the price-earnings ratio. I like to find a price-earnings ratio of under 25, because that’s a fair valuation. But people buy these stocks where… Would you like me to briefly just explain the P/E ratio for the audience?

Gene Tunny  11:36

Yes, please. Yes, I think that would be great, please, Paul. And yeah, what it roughly means.

Paul Mladjenovic  11:44

The price-earnings ratio tries to make a relationship between the stock, what you’re buying, and the essence of the company. The essence of the company is its profit, of course. And what we do is take a look at the price per share and the earnings per share.

Let’s say for example, you have a company that makes a million dollars net profits, and they have a million shares outstanding. Well, that’s a $1-per-share profit. The earnings per share is $1. Okay, so we can understand it. A million shares, a million dollars. It’s $1 earnings per share. Great. But now, let’s say that company’s stock is $10. Alrighty, so basically, you’re paying $10 for the stock, and you’re paying for $1 of earnings. So that’s a 10-to-one ratio. But that’s a P/E ratio of 10. Very fair valuation. Of course, if the stock is $15 or $20, you’re still in the ballpark. I think that’s a good price that you’re paying for it. In that case, if it’s 15, you’re paying $15 per stock, and you’re getting $1 of earnings.

What happens is this. If everyone’s excited about the stock, and they bid that stock all the way up, but the earnings are still down here, then you start getting into dangerous territory where you’re over, that there is an overvaluation, the price is much higher than what the company has in basic intrinsic worth. Back when the Internet stocks crashed, many of those P/E ratios were not 15 or 20 or whatever. They were north of 100. Some of them were over 1000, which means you’re paying an awful lot of money for the company. When it’s a nosebleed territory, then it’s in greater danger of a pullback.

The reason why they bid up the stock is that they’re assuming, oh, that’s a great company, the earnings are going to come in. They’re assuming that they’re buying up the stock, that the earnings are going to eventually rise, but you don’t know that. You’re basically speculating. You’re buying stocks today, hoping that tomorrow or next year, they can have a sensational profit, but that doesn’t always materialise. So at that case, you’re speculating. You’re not investing. Investing means you look at the reality of the moment, what you’re paying for, and the actual key components that a company are in a good price range, a good valuation, and the price is closer to it. Then it’s less risky.

I prefer people starting off with value investing, because it brings out much of the risk to begin with, because if you’re paying a lot of money for a stock, then the risk is, what happens if the earnings don’t materialise? What if they start to have losses? What if the economy slows down, and 100 other variables. Then that stock gets up here. It could easily be in bubble territory, pop and come back down and you’re sitting on a loser. That’s the issue with this. You want to go for valuation early on.

It’s like if you buy a dozen eggs, if they’re on sale for $1.99 for a dozen eggs, it’s a lot cheaper than if you were going to pay 10 or 20 bucks for the same dozen eggs. The eggs don’t change, but the price in the relationship does matter. This is among the things I emphasise, hopefully, throughout the book, and to casual readers everywhere. Hopefully that are not that casual with their money.

Gene Tunny  15:03

Yes, yes. I was just checking the P/E ratio for Tesla at the moment. I’m just looking at this one site. It says it’s 193.24, March 22, 2022. That’s a P/E ratio well in excess of–

Paul Mladjenovic  15:24

Exactly. Now, I have no problem with people investing in that type of stock. But they need to tell themselves that they’re not investing. They’re speculating. Could Tesla stock keep going up? Sure. Could it crash? Yes. And if there’s a slowdown out there, and less people are buying automobiles, and that puts a drag on the entire automotive industry, that’s going to put a drag on Tesla as well. Plus, it doesn’t pay a dividend. It’s not that you’re getting paid to hold the stock. For me, that’s a speculative choice. Nothing wrong with that. There’s nothing wrong with people speculating. But they need to know that there’s a very material difference between an investment and a speculation. And they need to know that.

Gene Tunny  16:06

If my portfolio was heavy with stocks like Tesla, I would be a growth investor, rather than a value investor. Is that how I should be–

Paul Mladjenovic  16:21

If they all have that kind of valuation, you’re hoping for growth. But the thing is, in reality, you’re speculating, because you’re expecting a stock with a 200 P/E ratio, that you’re hoping that it goes to 250 or higher, translation meaning that their income is coming in and the stock price is going up. They’re bidding it up, and that way you’re holding it, and your stock went up. But you don’t know that. To me, there’s a greater risk in those kinds of stocks. But the thing is this. Fortunately, it’s not all or nothing. There’s nothing wrong with having a few aggressive speculations in your portfolio, but they better not make the majority of the foundation of your portfolio, otherwise you’ll be at risk, especially since when you juxtapose it today’s macro economic environment, it is riskier out there.

I don’t see anything here that’s going to say that a particular automotive company are going to double the number of their cars they’re going to sell next year, when there’s a lot of debt out there. Interest rates are rising. A lot of people buying automobiles. Some of them, fine, you could buy it all cash, well, good for you, I cheer you on. But the majority of the market out there would tend to be borrowing money. And if interest rates go up, then they may not choose that Tesla. They might choose a competing model for now. I think there’s a lot of fragility in today’s economy, if a lot of these things continue the way they’ve been going. I was expecting inflation and everything else over a year ago, and it’s materialising now. Gene, from what I know about you, you’re a smart guy. You were probably there even before me, and hopefully people have benefited from some of your insights months ago.

Gene Tunny  18:10

Our mutual friend Darren Brady Nelson and I were chatting about this, definitely last year, the potential inflation, just because of, as you would have seen, all of the money growth that we’ve been experiencing associated with quantitative easing, and the housing credit boom that we’ve had in here in Australia, and then in other countries. So yeah, certainly something we’ve been expecting. I’d like to ask all about the P/E ratio again. Clearly, it’s relevant to particular stocks. Are you also looking at it from the whole market point of view? There’s a measure of the P/E ratio for the whole market is in there. Is it the cyclically adjusted P/E ratio?

Paul Mladjenovic  18:58

Exactly. Whenever I see that, what is the cumulative P/E ratio for the S&P 500, for example, which is considered obviously a major yardstick and a major barometer of the general health of the stock market. I haven’t looked at it lately, but I do know that it is elevated. It is higher than it should be the last time I looked. That is also a cautionary tale.

For me, because I like to invest in human needs stocks, they tend to have a lower P/E ratio. And so that’s a measure of safety for me. Not the only one, but certainly one of the primary ones. The other side I like to look at, again, especially when I’m dealing with beginners or beginning intermediates, one of my criteria is also they should be investing in stocks that are paying dividends. We call them stock dividends, but they’re really company dividends, because a dividend that’s being paid out by a company. Obviously, if it’s a successful company, the dividend tends to rise, over an extended period of time, like years and decades. And it’s a sign of health. It’s a clear, tangible measurement of the company’s financial success. If they’re having a dividend that’s rising every year, that’s a good sign. So I like that.

And the other point of it is too is that whenever there’s a market crash or a major market event and stocks go down, you’ll find out that dividend stocks tend to be among those that tend to recover a little bit sooner. For me, if my stock goes up or down 10 or 20%, but my dividends are coming in, quarter in, quarter out, I’m not that worried about it. For many reasons, including in family accounts, we talk about having the cash flow coming in. I have clients and students that I remember from decades ago, that today, they’re getting annual dividend payouts greater than their initial stock investment from decades ago. It’s gotta make you feel good.

If a stock falls, then what happens is that… For example, again, using a simple example, if I have a $20 stock, and it’s paying a $1 dividend, that’s the equivalent yield of 5%. 5% of 20 is $1. All right. So let’s say that today, the market is crashing big time, and my $20 stock went to $10 a share. All right. Obviously, I’m not happy. But the thing is, now that $10 stock, if it’s still paying a $1 dividend – again, I’m looking at the health of the company, it’s making a profit or whatever – if it’s still paying $1 dividend and the stock is $10 now, that tells me that the dividend yield at this moment would be 10%. That is a very attractive yield. So what happens is other investors will go in and bid it back up again. And so it has an easier time recovering.

The bottom line is, Gene, is that healthy, quality companies will keep zigzagging upward, no matter what you throw at them, whereas companies that are not financially stable, don’t have all the numbers, are losing money, they’re going to be zigzagging downward. So, which zigzag you want to be part of? You look at these things, because they’re not mysteries. This is public data.

Gene Tunny  22:18

Yeah, I think it’s great advice. And it’s consistent with what David Bahnsen recently told me when I chatted with him, and he was talking about his views on dividends. He’s very pro dividends. I think it’s also consistent with Warren Buffett, isn’t it? I mean, Warren Buffett looks for those companies that deliver reliable earnings over the long term. And in his day, I’m not sure if it’s still the case now, it was Geico, the Government Employees Insurance Company, and also Coca-Cola, I think. So those are the sort of dependable companies that… Not that I’m making any particular recommendations, but it’s those sort of companies, I’m guessing.

Paul Mladjenovic  23:06

And by the way, the human needed investing, as much as I love it for beginners, etc, in the generic sense, also it tends to be a great approach and strategy during inflationary times. The last year and a half, especially with my end with the Federal Reserve, printing up trillions, look, people forget that inflation is not the price of goods and services going up, it’s the value of money going down. When you over-produce something, and you have more units of it out there, chasing the same basket of goods and services, then don’t be surprised that the prices go up.

Plus, in addition, during the pandemic, and people were worried about their economic situations, etc. , when people are worried, and there’s anxiety, and there’s a declining or low consumer confidence, then people will not invest in their wants. They won’t spend on their wants. They’ll spend on their needs. They may want fancy whatever, trips and vacations and snazzy restaurants and so much more. But if the economy is contracting, and there’s more worry on the radar screen, and people are worried about their companies, their jobs, etc, then they’re going to shrink what they’re spending on that that is want-driven. And they will keep on buying things that are need-driven, so that they’re trying to adjust accordingly to the economic environment.

So all of a sudden, you start to think that those things that we do need, all of a sudden in an inflationary environment, it’s almost like they’ve switched hats to be more growth-oriented. You have found that in the last 3, 6, 9, 12 months, the things we’ve invested in that we needed, all of a sudden, they become spectacularly solid  things to put your money in. Grains, for example. I spoke to some of my students last year. I said, “If you’re investing in money, where it’s tied to things that are rising in price such as human need, and you’re talking about energy, gasoline, you’re talking about groceries, which means food and commodities, those things have performed very well.” So, in many cases, I tell people out there and yeah, yeah, good, you can keep complaining about inflation, but part of your action plan is to be invested in those things that benefit from inflation versus being hammered by inflation.

Gene Tunny  25:34

Okay, we’ll take a short break here for a word from our sponsor.

Female speaker  25:39

If you need to crunch the numbers, then get in touch with Adept Economics. We offer you frank and fearless economic analysis and advice, we can help you with funding submissions, cost-benefit analysis studies, and economic modelling of all sorts. Our head office is in Brisbane, Australia, but we work all over the world. You can get in touch via our website, http://www.adepteconomics.com.au. We’d love to hear from you.

Gene Tunny  26:08

Now back to the show. Now with an action plan, Paul, I’d like to explore that, what that means for an individual or for a household, because we need to think about how diversified should your portfolio be, and then also how actively or passively you should manage it. Do you have views on those that you could take us through, please?

Paul Mladjenovic  26:35

Yeah. There’s the simple 80/20 rule, if you want. All things being equal, I’d love to see people put 80% of their foundational investment money into human need things, food, water, beverage, utilities. Again, it’s a very simple question. Ask yourself, what will people keep on buying, no matter how good or bad the economy is. If people are unemployed, they’re still going to eat, they’re still going to turn on their lights. And that’s where you should have your money, especially if you’re a beginner, and especially if these are worrisome times.

And I like the dividend portion, because then I know that, in many cases, especially many brokerage accounts, they give you the ability to reinvest the dividends. So even if you don’t need the money, if the stocks are down and contracting, the dividends will buy more of it. Then on the other side of it down the road, when you’re ready to have the money being sent home to you, it’d be good to know that over a period of years, and you started with 50 shares, now you have 75, 100, 150, and now their dividends are higher, plus there’s more shares, which means you’re going to have more money coming in to make yourself more financially secure in your later years.

A lot of stock investing, it doesn’t have to be mysterious or crazy. A lot of people think that to make the real big bucks got to be extra risky and extra speculative and extra growth-oriented. Well, that might be true with a portion of your money, but it shouldn’t be the bulk of your money. Absolutely. So 80% value to human need. And I’m saying this real time too, March 2022. And I think a lot of people’s experience with human need is bearing these points out. There, at least 80%. How’s that?

Gene Tunny  28:24

So yeah, 80% on investments–

Paul Mladjenovic  28:27

Of your investable money should be in human need things.It doesn’t have to be just stocks. There are ETFs. There’s actually excellent dividend ETFs, where they’re tied to human need and pay dividends. Again, I can’t get specific with this audience because I don’t know who I’m talking to. But everybody knows they can go on a search engine and find dividend ETFs. They can find ETFs.

For example, when the economy is doing very well, and everybody is flush with cash and they’re positive, then they might go for, I said wants, and that basically is a reference to consumer discretionary. When you have extra cash, what do you do? Fancier restaurants, vacation, take the missus out for the weekend somewhere, all good stuff. When you’re talking about a contracting or problematic economy and commensurate issues in the stock market, then you think consumer staples, that’s where a lot of those human needs are going to be.

There are ETFs that invest just in consumer staples or utilities. You don’t have to worry about trying to choose one winning stock. Why not a winning ETF or winning mutual funds? There’s a lot of sector mutual funds out there. There are food and beverage mutual funds. There are food and beverage ETFs. And these would make a lot of sense in today’s environment, for 2022 and probably for the remainder of this year, because I don’t see any spectacular rebound coming in the economy. And if they’re going to raise interest rates, because they’re fighting inflation, somebody’s going to win, somebody’s going to lose.

Right now, there’s people out there who have a lot of fixed bond. That bonds market is huge. You can have a spectacular problem with the bond market, because if there’s a lot of fixed debt, and interest rates are rising, what will people do? You want to get rid of your, whatever, 2.5% bond and buy a 5% bond? That’s fine, but then that means a lot of selling. And so in this environment, I tell people, if you are going to be in bonds, make sure they’re high-quality AAA, and that they’re adjustable rates. And that could be another component of your portfolio, if you want something diversified away from the stock market. Those are the kind of choices, AAA, high quality, and adjustable rates involved so that you’re not stuck. You don’t want to be stuck with a fixed interest rate, like say, 30-year bonds, and rates are going to be driven upward. That’s going to be like a hammer to the value of the bonds you’re currently holding. Okay, so adjustable rate, quality, AAA, if you can have that, that’s the kind you should have.

Gene Tunny  31:03

That’s 80%. There’s another 20%, is there?

Paul Mladjenovic  31:09

Yeah, exactly. If you’re ultra worried, and you don’t want growth, then maybe 20% should be an adjustable rate, high-quality bonds.

Gene Tunny  31:16

Oh, gotcha. Right. So that’s a really safe part of it.

Paul Mladjenovic  31:20

That’s a possibility, exactly. If you’re more growth-oriented, then put 20% into growth-oriented stocks or ETFs, again, depending on… See, the interesting thing is that investing and speculating can be something in a generic, but in many cases, it depends on the person involved. If I’m talking to somebody who’s a year or two from retirement, then you’d bet they’d have to be much more so into very secure things, human need, high-quality, adjustable rate bonds, money in the bank, low debt, and a few other features. That would be important. But if you’re talking to a 25-year-old, I’d still say, keep the bulk in your human need, but now you could put your money into growth-oriented things that are out there, some types of commodities, because inflation is pushing some of these things up. If people have seen the price of gasoline and wheat in recent months, then they get a good idea about the kind of things that grow in an inflation-driven environment, as we’re in right now.

Gene Tunny  32:18

Yeah. What are your thoughts on real estate, so both your own home and also investment properties? Do you have any thoughts on that? One of the challenges we’ve got in many advanced economies is just the very high cost of housing at the moment. And I’ve seen some commentators questioning whether buying your own home actually does make sense for a lot of young people. So yeah, I’m interested in your thoughts on that.

Paul Mladjenovic  32:48

First of all, obviously, owning your own home I think is fine. I see no problem with it. Obviously, I don’t argue with real estate folks. I know some people who will rent a cheap apartment, then they have their money and invested it and buy rental real estate. That’s fine. Some of this is a personal proclivity. Me, for example, I love real estate, but I don’t buy fixer uppers or other type of thing. My favourite type of real estate investing is true real estate investment trusts that I can buy with a few mouse clicks through my brokerage account. Those people who want to be beginners in the world of real estate, and you’re nodding your head so I think you generally agree, that I think real estate investment trusts is a great place for the beginners to be.

I like the idea that with a few mouse clicks I can get in, and a few mouse clicks, I can get out. The same rules of real estate apply when you’re talking about real estate investment trusts, REITs. You look at the type of real estate, and you look at the location, very important. For me, I like that there are a couple of hundred different REITs out there, certainly in the American market. I’m sure there’s more. I’m sure there’s some in your neck of the woods, etc. But REITs are a way that I can buy a few shares, whether it’s 5 shares, 50 shares, 100 shares, or more, I can participate in a real estate property, get my dividends, CD appreciation, but somebody else is… You have an executive team that’s managing all the properties and that’s their specialty. I prefer that.

Keep in mind, real estate investing, think about the types of real estate. Right now, in the last couple of years, I’ve told my students that I would avoid things like office building real estate investment trusts, because I think if the economy’s going to shrink, and you got pandemic residual issues, why do you want to be there?  I would be invested in REITs that are in the residential complex. For example, the last few years I’ve avoided like the plague shopping centre REITs, and instead I’ve been looking into REITs that specialise in data storage. They still pay dividends. And you see more movement there. There are REITs that are cell tower REITs. In other words, their property is cell towers. They pay good dividends. And cell towers won’t go out of style anytime soon. And if you have teenagers, you know what I mean.

Gene Tunny  35:23

That’s interesting. I’ll have to have a look at some of those. I wasn’t aware of those. That’s fascinating. Paul, can I ask you about gold and silver? You’ve written on gold and silver in the past.

Paul Mladjenovic  35:36

I’ve written two books on precious metals. And I’ve been very bullish on gold and silver and other metals over the last few years. And I feel that when everything finally shakes out, I see no reason why gold and silver couldn’t be at new market highs in the coming months. I have associates of mine who feel that these things will go to new multiples of where they’re at now. That remains to be seen. But the bottom line is, I do think that gold and silver will be appreciating for a variety of reasons. And I think they’re part of a portfolio that’s really…

Let me tell you, I can give one important reason why everybody in your audience should own at least a little bit of gold and silver. Are you ready? I’m going to give you a reason that you won’t hear very often. And by the way, if your financial advisor talks you out of them, tell them to call me. And this is what I meant. Okay, so anybody within the sound of my voice, remember the following phrase, counterparty risk. Counterparty risk. That’s the number one reason why you should have some. I’m not asking you to head for the hills and live in a cave and have a tonne of either one. No, not really. You should be diversified away from the risks of paper assets.

Me, I love gold. I love stock investing. I love the paper assets, definitely. But I favour gold and silver, the physical, because gold and silver are two assets that  are among the few assets on the landscape of choices, of investment choices that do not have a counterparty risk. You talk to your financial advisors about this, see if they know this point. It’s very important. Years ago, I remember I used to even teach financial advisors, and I think this is an important factor.

What is counterparty risk? See, here’s the thing. If you invest in any type of paper assets, you’re undergoing counterparty risk. For example, if I buy stock, the counterparty risk is the performance of the company. In other words, counterparty risk means that if you invest in an asset, the value of this asset is directly dependent upon the promise or performance of the counterparty. If I buy stock, and that company is doing great, my stock will be fine, I’m sure. At the moment that counterparty fails, falters, goes into debt, goes bankrupt, what’s going to happen to the value of my stock at that point? You follow? There is counterparty risk with stocks.

Bonds, perfect example of counterparty risk. If I invest in a bond, the first risk I think of is that, will the payer of this bond pay back the principal and the interest as stipulated in bond agreements, to me as the bond holder. There’s counterparty risk there. What if that entity defaults? Many times in history, especially during bad economic times, people have defaulted on bonds. And so you have to understand that, but also to currencies.

Right now, inflation means that that money is losing value. And that’s a counterparty risk, because a currency is only as good as the counterparty being the central bank of that country, managing, hopefully, properly, that money supply. And we’re seeing that there’s inflation everywhere, the ruble falling apart in Russia, because of the conflict, runaway inflation in Venezuela, etc. In many cases, the currency of a country is similar to the dynamic of the stock with the company. When the company is doing well, the stock does well. If the country is strong and doing very well, and they’re managing their currency, then that currency will be strong. But once you mismanage that, and the currency goes into hyperinflation…

By the way, you’re talking to a guy who has experiences personally with my family. In 1963, as a four-year-old with my family, we escaped communist Yugoslavia. And by the way, communism is a horrible thing, but that’s a different conversation. But they, in 1993, 1994, tried to help out their own economy with inflating the currency, the dinar, and you had one of history’s greatest hyperinflationary catastrophic incidents occur in Yugoslavia, and it collapsed into nothing basically. No more Yugoslavia as of 1994 . I got married in 1993. So my wife and I were thinking about going to Yugoslavia for our honeymoon, but as the civil war it was going through and collapse, these things ruin a good honeymoon. So we opted for the Caribbean instead. And in retrospect, am I glad I did.

Gene Tunny 40:18

Absolutely.

Paul Mladjenovic 40:19

Currencies have counterparty risk. Virtually every paper asset you can think of has a counterparty risk. Its value is directly tied to the promise or the performance of a counterparty. Gold and silver have their own intrinsic value. Gold and silver have never gone to zero. They had value thousands of years ago, they have value now, and likely, gold and silver will continue to have value far into the future. So precious metals, and I mean, the physical, look into bullion coins and the like. Do your shopping. As you know, I did the book Investing in Gold and Silver for Dummies. It’s a whole book on how to choose and shop for it, etc. But gold and silver, again, are a diversification away from currency mismanagement, away from the risk of paper assets, away from geopolitical and other risks. And I think that that is an important fact. And let’s face it, you hear about the rich over the aeons, the centuries, they always had gold and silver. The people are in the know. They know something, I think that’s something for you, that should be a clue to you to start figuring it out and seeing if a small portion does make sense in your overall picture. And I think given today’s economic realities, a portion of it doesn’t make sense.

Gene Tunny  41:38

What about NFTs and crypto that everyone’s talking about? Have you had any exposure to that or do you have any thoughts on that? There’s a lot of excitement about it.

Paul Mladjenovic  41:52

Let me tell you, a few years ago, I was asked about writing a book on cryptocurrency. And the point is, I think I’m good at what I know, but I know the limits of what I know. And I got them a great author on that book. So my publisher does have one called Cryptocurrency Investing for Dummies, and she does a great job with it.

Again, I feel the same way, having a small portion of it is not a bad idea. But there’s been just a lot of, I don’t know, overwrought speculation about it in recent years. And the thing is this. Part of the success of cryptocurrency, again, was the idea that it’s limited in scope. And, and so obviously, if you don’t over-produce it, and more people are buying it, then of course, you’ve seen how well it’s performed. I mean, it’s been amazingly volatile, crashing here and there. And I think investing small amounts here and there, again, as a small diversification away from everything else, is not a bad idea, but a lot of these people who are going whole hog into it, etc, we have to be careful. You have to remember that the governments of the world look at cryptocurrencies as a competitor, and nothing stops them from waking up one morning, passing a few laws and regulations, and all of a sudden, your cryptocurrency becomes problematic versus being an asset. So again, tread lightly here. Obviously, you may get a cryptocurrency expert on who will have a totally different opinion. And I’m not here to argue with those folks.

Again, I think having some cryptocurrencies is fine. And for me, some of my clients, I say to them, why not get some of the blockchain technology companies, because that way, you’re indirectly working with it. And that worked out to be a pretty good speculation. But again, same feelings as with gold and silver, have some of it, not an overwhelming amount, because you never know, because cryptocurrency… Everything we’re talking about has some kind of risk. With cryptocurrencies, what happens? I mean, it’s extremely dependent on electricity. What happens when there’s a power outage? Can you trade with it then? I doubt it.

The whole point about guys like me, in my industry… I was a certified financial planner for 36 years. I retired it a year ago, but I’m still active with education and teaching about this and I love my topic. I doubt I’ll retire anytime soon. I love what I do too much. However, the world of CFPs and financial advisors, they live and breathe the word diversification. Every asset has some type of risk attached to it, if you have money in the bank, fine, you’re away from financial risk, but now how about inflation risk, purchasing power risk, and a few other ones out there? What if the bank closes its doors because there’s a national crisis with the central bank, etc?

This is why you have a little bit across the board. That diversification just makes you stronger and not dependent on the goodness or wellness or the speculative success of an individual entity or asset class. Again, have some cryptocurrencies, fine. Have a couple of different ones, fine. But don’t have your life savings in it. Don’t put too huge of a percentage of your investable assets in it. Same thing as I would say with many other things that are out there. And of course, everything mitigates things. If you are a real estate expert, then having more of a portion of your assets in real estate is not that big of a deal, because your personal expertise is mitigating the extra exposure, but that’s fine. Knowledge is always the thing you should be accumulating the most, after accumulating your wealth, because the both of those things are tied together.

Gene Tunny  45:40

Yeah. Very good observation there, Paul. A couple more questions on how actively should a person be managing their portfolio. Typically I’ve just sort of said, maybe I made some decisions, like a couple of years ago, I’ll invest in this ETF or I’ll have these investments. And I’ll just commit to putting a certain amount in every month or whatever. And you get that, they call it that dollar cost averaging technique. You’re not worried about what the prices are at any particular time. And then over time, you do better out of that. How do you think about how actively investors should be managing their portfolios? How frequently should they be reviewing their selections? Any thoughts on that?

Paul Mladjenovic  46:36

Again, everyone’s a little bit differently, but if you’re not reviewing monthly or quarterly statements, if you’re not speaking to whoever you trust at least once a year or once every half year, then there’ll be issues, obviously. The more you’re aware about what you have, the better. I mean, I look at decisions every day, for my family. And the interesting thing is, if there’s one thing that people need to understand also, it is that to be successfully monitoring your situation, keep in mind that successful investing isn’t just what you invest in, but how do you go about doing it. If your positions are residing in a brokerage account, then nothing stops you. I highly encourage everybody within the sound of my voice to speak to your customers, to your brokerage firm’s customer service department, ask about things, about tutorials and things like stoploss orders, trailing stops. Sometimes you could do some, again, to a small extent, things such as covered call writing, which gives you income. It’s a hedge on a position as well, in some cases.

For example, trailing stops, I’m a big one on this, if, if you’re nervous about what you’re holding, alrighty, then again, it’s not just what you invest in, it’s how you go about doing it. Then you should consider trailing stops to minimise the downside. Now, what does that mean? Well, well, first of all, the generic about a stoploss order. If I bought a stock at 20, and I’m nervous about it, then I should put a stoploss order in at 18, 10% below, just as a generic point. 10% lower, you give it room to fluctuate. My stock at 20, if I bought it, obviously, there’s no upside limitation. But at 18, I now have downside limitation. In other words you’re adding discipline to your situation. You’re not just blindly watching this stuff. You could put that stoploss order in for the day or make it good until cancelled. It could sit there for three months.

If you’re worried about the coming weeks and months, go through your portfolio. If you need to go with your financial advisor, by all means, and say, I’m nervous about position x over here, what should I do? Well, they should be telling you. First of all, if it’s quality, that should remove some of the anxiety. But if you’re still worried, then either, A, sell it if you need the money, or if you don’t need the money, then put in a stoploss order in it. And then what happens? Let’s say your $20 stock zigzags up to 30. Okay, well, now what? That $18 stoploss, cancel it, like it says, good until cancelled, and replace it with one at 27, as an example. Now, what happens? The stock is at 30, you put a stoploss in at 27. Well, now what? Now if there’s a market crash, stock will go down, will trigger a sell order at 27, and you’re out. And you kept 100% of your original $20 plus a $7 per share profit. You added diligence and safety and discipline to your situation, not because you were expecting it, but because you started worrying etc. Then put those on. What’s the worst that happens? You’re selling and protect your money and keep a portion of your profits. Well then, that’s the very essence of prudent investing. You follow?

So in other words, everybody within the sound on my voice, if you have a brokerage account, go to their site. They’ve got to tutorials and other things. Call them up. Ask them, hey, what can I do if I’m worried about my stock dropping? What can I do? Have that conversation. But I find that a lot of people don’t have those conversation, and then what? Then when there is a market crash, and your positions plummet all the way down to the bottom or whatever, or lose 50%, then you do could’ve, would’ve, should’ve, you have anxiety, and so much more.

Right now, as I’m talking to you, the markets are generally in good shape today. But that could change next week. You could have a 1,000-point drop on a Monday morning, because you have trillions flowing in and out. You’ve got sanctions and unintended consequences. You don’t know when the next crisis is going to blow up, which in turn will blow up point A, point B, point C, and all of a sudden, you wake up one morning and your position or your broker has been hammered to pieces. Again, diversification. Remember that you have many tools and tactics in your pocket with these brokerage firms that you should be fully aware of. When you’re fully aware of these and you start applying some of these things in a very modest way, your confidence grow, your knowledge grows, which means more importantly, your financial security does better.

Gene Tunny  51:18

Yeah. Okay. I might ask one more question before we wrap up, Paul. There was an interesting passage in your book on Stock Investing for Dummies, where you’re asking what school of economic thought does the analyst adhere to? So this is things you should ask about analysts when you’re assessing the value of their contributions, what they’re saying, what their advice is. You make a point that if there was one that adhered to the Keynesian school of economic thought, that’s analyst A, and analyst B adhered to the Austrian School. Guess what? I’d choose analyst B, because those who embrace the Austrian School have a much better grasp of real world economics, which means better stock investment choices. Could you explain what you mean, there, please?

Paul Mladjenovic  52:05

Well, it’s funny, you brought up an interesting point. I mean, I love the Austrian School. And as you know, Darren is a devotee of that. It doesn’t necessarily mean the Austrian School… There’s a couple of other schools that are pretty good. There’s the Chicago school, Milt Friedman, I admire his work. It’s just that there are many financial advisors out there who… Obviously, Maynard Keynes, I don’t think highly of him. I mean, if I had a financial advisor who loved Karl Marx, I would be terrified, because that tells me they know nothing about economics. I’m serious about this. Yeah, I’m very serious about it.

By the way, to me, it’s not that I look for a financial advisor who’s into these particular schools. Question number 17, that helps me hone my selections. I want to make sure that they’ve been around for a few decades, they’ve seen bear markets and bull markets. That’s a much more important criteria for me that they understand these things. But if it ever comes down to the school, I’m going to make sure they understand, because remember, it was the free market schools out there were warning about the Great Depression, they were warning about stock market bubbles, and they were warning about these things. I found out that these disciplines helped me be a better tactician and strategist with the money.

I mean, I remember when I read an article about the stock market bubble in 1999, and that was from the point of view of the economics. That just cemented some of my concerns about the stock market. What did it mean? For those students and clients who were your conservative, retirement-oriented, made sure they were in safer waters. But those people out there who were speculators, like me, for example, I made sure that I was not invested in the internet stocks of 2000, because the first wave, you don’t know which ones are going to survive or not. They were all losing money. So in terms of investment, I stay away from them. However, my speculative side, I was buying long-term put options on these. So when these things collapsed, my speculative put options garnered some very nice gains. And that was my speculating.

Understanding basic economics and following some of these schools of thought would just enhance  your ability,  because obviously, understanding the macro picture makes you a better choice of which micro choices, which stocks and ETFs are going to either survive or thrive in that kind of economic environment, and it actually gives you another leg up. When you understand the big picture, it just makes it better choices in your own portfolio, so you could sleep better at night and serve the family that you love.

Gene Tunny  54:48

Okay, that’s a great point, Paul. I was just thinking about Keynes. Keynes himself was a rather good investor and made a lot of money for King’s College in Cambridge. However, I think there’s some speculation that he may have benefited to an extent from insider knowledge he gained while working for the Treasury.

Paul Mladjenovic  55:13

That’s very possible. And actually, when you think about it in the 1920s, look him up, there was an economist called Irving Fisher. When the stock market was in bubble territory, he was notorious for making the call that he feels that they’ve reached a permanent plateau. And this was whatever, like six or nine months before the crash of 1929, and he had been filing for bankruptcy. So no one should have listened to Irving Fisher, including Irving Fisher.

Gene Tunny  55:42

Exactly. Okay. Paul, any final points before we wrap up? I think this has been great. You’ve given me a lot to think about. And I mean, I think we could chat for hours on this stuff. But I think I’ll have to wrap up now. And yeah, I’d be keen to chat with you again.

Paul Mladjenovic  55:57

I really appreciate it. I mean, obviously, you mentioned Stock Investing for Dummies, I’ve done a lot of books out there. So I certainly invite people to see if those things help them with theirs. And if people want to find me, I’m at ravingcapitalist.com. But the point is this. Knowledge is really so important with all of this, and the idea that you’re a better consumer or a better investor, it also makes you a better voter, too, , and it also makes you much more aware of what policies out there will do harm and which ones will do right, and which investments will go up or down accordingly. It’s all about the knowledge. Ignorance is going to be extremely problematic in the coming months. So I invite them to get as much knowledge as possible, apply it, talk to everybody, you’ll be much better off. If they keep on listening to gentlemen such as Gene Tunny, then I think they’ll be served well, and thank you again and again. God bless your audience, and I wish them all prosperity.

Gene Tunny  56:54

Thank you. Paul, it’s been a pleasure. Really appreciate your time. And yeah, I hope to chat with you again soon. Thanks so much.

Paul Mladjenovic  57:02

Continued success to all of you. Take care, Gene.

Gene Tunny  57:04 Thank you. Okay, that’s the end of this episode of Economics Explored. I hope you enjoyed it. If so, please tell your family and friends and leave a comment or give us a rating on your podcast app. If you have any comments, questions, suggestions, you can feel free to send them to contact@economicsexplored.com And we’ll aim to address them in a future episode. Thanks for listening. Until next week, goodbye.

Credits

Big thanks to EP133 guest Paul Mladjenovic and to the show’s audio engineer Josh Crotts for his assistance in producing the episode. 

Please get in touch with any questions, comments and suggestions by emailing us at contact@economicsexplored.com or sending a voice message via https://www.speakpipe.com/economicsexplored. Economics Explored is available via Apple PodcastsGoogle Podcast, and other podcasting platforms.

Categories
Podcast episode

The virtues of the free market w/ David Bahnsen – EP132

Renowned US financial advisor, author, and podcaster David Bahnsen argues the best way to defend human flourishing against dangerous economic thinking is to relearn time-tested economic truths. David talks about his new book There’s No Free Lunch: 250 Economic Truths with show host Gene Tunny. David and Gene also talk about David’s previous books on the crisis of responsibility afflicting our societies, Elizabeth Warren’s economic policies, and investing in a post-crisis world.

You can listen to the conversation using the embedded player below or via Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Stitcher, among other podcast apps.

About this episode’s guest – David Bahnsen

David L. Bahnsen is Founder, Managing Partner, and Chief Investment Officer of the Bahnsen Group. He oversees the management of over $3.5 billion in client assets. Prior to launching The Bahnsen Group, he spent eight years as a Managing Director at Morgan Stanley and six years as a Vice President at UBS. He is consistently named as one of the top financial advisors in America by Barron’s, Forbes, and the Financial Times (2016-2021).

David’ Bahnsen’s 2021 book There’s No Free Lunch: 250 Economic Truths.

Relevant links and a transcript are below.

Links relevant to the conversation

David Bahnsen’s previous books:

Elizabeth Warren: How Her Presidency Would Destroy the Middle Class and the American Dream

The Case for Dividend Growth: Investing in a Post-Crisis World

Crisis of Responsibility: Our Cultural Addiction to Blame and How You Can Cure It

David’s podcasts:

Capital Record

The Dividend Cafe

Radio Free California

Other relevant links:

The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left by Yuval Levin

Edmund Burke (1729 – 1797)

Transcript of EP132 – The virtues of the free market w/ David Bahnsen

N.B. This is a lightly edited version of a transcript originally created using the AI application otter.ai. It may not be 100 percent accurate, but should be pretty close. If you’d like to quote from it, please check the quoted segment in the recording.

Gene Tunny  00:01

Coming up on Economics Explored.

David Bahnsen  00:04

There’s no question that whether one accepts my religious assumptions or not, that the free market properly aligns incentives better than the Marxist or central planning, collectivist vision for society that strips away incentives and does not provide the framework for best serving a customer by meeting human needs.

Gene Tunny  00:34

Welcome to the Economics Explored podcast, a frank and fearless exploration of important economic issues. I’m your host, Gene Tunny. I’m a professional economist based in Brisbane, Australia, and I’m a former Australian Treasury official. This is Episode 132, featuring a conversation with economist and investment manager, David Bahnsen. about his new book, There’s No Free Lunch: 250 Economic Truths. We also talk about his previous books on Elizabeth Warren, his approach to investing, and what he calls the crisis of responsibility.

David is the founder, managing partner, and chief investment officer of the Bahnsen Group, a US national private wealth management firm, with offices in Newport Beach, New York City, Nashville, and Minneapolis, managing over $3.5 billion in client assets. David is consistently named as one of the top financial advisors in America by Barron’s, Forbes, and the Financial Times. He is a frequent guest on Fox News, Fox Business, CNBC and Bloomberg. And he’s a regular contributor to National Review.

Please check out the show notes for links to materials mentioned in this episode, and for any clarifications. One that I know that I need to make relates to the statesman Edmund Burke, who I shifted forward in time by a century. Silly me. You can find the show notes via your podcasting app. And please check out our website, Economics Explored, where I’ll post a transcript of the conversation as soon as I can. That’s economicsexplored.com. If you sign up as an email subscriber, you can download my recent e-book, Top 10 Insights from Economics. Please consider getting on the mailing list. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, please either record them in a message via SpeakPipe – see the link in the show notes – or email me via contact@economicsexplored.com. Righto, now for my conversation with David Bahnsen, Thanks to my audio engineer Josh Crotts for his assistance in producing this episode. I hope you enjoy it. David Bahnsen, founder, managing partner and chief investment officer of the Bahnsen Group, welcome to the programme.

David Bahnsen  02:53

Well, good to be with you. Thanks for having me.

Gene Tunny  02:56

Oh, it’s a pleasure, David. I’ve come across your work recently. A mutual acquaintance of ours, Darren Brady Nelson, mentioned you to me and I’ve been reading your great books, There’s No Free Lunch: 250 Economic Truths. You had a book on Elizabeth Warren, the Democratic presidential candidate, how her presidency would destroy the middle class and the American dream. And you’ve got a couple of others.  I’m really keen to chat with you about your views on economics. You’re someone who has had a very successful career as an investor. And you credit that partly to your understanding of economics, so yeah, really keen to understand your views on economics as someone who’s really proven the relevance and the importance of economics. First, I’d like to ask, with your book, There’s No Free Lunch: 250 Economic Truths, what was your guiding principle for selecting those economic truths? How did you go about it? And what do you think of the major truths, David?

David Bahnsen  04:01

Well, I tried to divide the book up compartmentally by categories, and I start with the belief that economics is about human beings, and not fundamentally a mathematical science or a political science. And so out of the social realities of mankind, if we’re to understand economics out of that truth, then it forces us to discover or inquire what we believe about mankind. And what we know about the human person can then inform us more about economics, if we believe in the premise that economics is the study of human action.

I believe distinctly anthropological truths about mankind, about how he was made, about the characteristics he was made with. And those beliefs serve as a kind of starting point to what I believe about what we consider economics. And so you then go on to certain a priori assumptions that there is scarcity in the world. And economics becomes the study of how humans act around the allocation of scarcity, their scarce resources. And so I’m very convinced that most people are trying to get their economic opinions out of their political beliefs, instead of getting a lot of their political beliefs out of their economic worldview, and particularly in certain policy assumptions. And so the policy beliefs and biases and so forth, I think need to be informed by a coherent economic worldview. And that’s what I’m trying to provide in the book.

And for a lot of people, I think that the book will serve as a reinforcement of things that they instinctively believe, but there may be an impulse to some of these free market assumptions, but not necessarily rooted in a deeper belief system. And that’s what I’m trying to point people back to is those foundational beliefs that can help inform a comprehensive understanding of economics.

Gene Tunny  06:32

Yeah. Look, I found that fascinating. That was something I really found valuable about your book. I mean, you reference great thinkers in economics, such as Adam Smith and Hayek, and Mises. What I really liked was your commentary as well.  You’ve got great quotes. And then you’ve also got your commentary. And one of the things you wrote, I found very profound. I want to make sure I fully understand it, because I’m not a deeply religious person.  I think I know what you’re saying here. But I want to make sure I understand it. You wrote that, “Our case is not that mankind’s fall is suspended when he transacts in the marketplace, it is that the marketplace best tames are fallen nature. The fallen nature, is this what you’re talking about with understanding where we’re coming from, people fundamentally? But is that a religious concept or is it a psychological concept? Could you explain what you’re driving at in that passage, please, David?

David Bahnsen  07:35

Yeah, it’s entirely religious. It is entirely theological. And yet, I’m perfectly content for someone to interpret it only psychologically. But the underlying teleological meaning of it, the purpose is rooted in a belief that mankind does not come in the world perfect. Mankind comes in a world where they fall in moral nature. And this is, to me, the fundamental divide between most political divisions, philosophical divisions, and I also believe economic, is if we believe that mankind is fundamentally good, and then can be corrupted by injustices amongst race or class or gender, things like that, or those who believe that mankind comes in what we in the Christian tradition refer to as the doctrine of original sin, and that we want institutions, family, communities, church, synagogue, the marketplace, to provide a sort of moral formation, and that mankind cannot become perfected. The great socialist and utopian vision is rooted in a belief that mankind can become perfectible. And this is against my own religious assumption.

But the economic relevance to it is that we are trying to solve for a system of social organisation that recognises certain assumptions. And one of my assumptions is not only the imperfectibility of mankind, but also that mankind is created in a certain way, and that that creation that I am asserting involves mankind’s rationality, their reasonability, that there is both a physical, material, and a spiritual dimension. And so those things end up having significant economic implications, because I reject the belief that our need in forming economic policy is to merely meet the material needs of mankind, to give them some sort of water and food and sustenance and call it a day. I believe that mankind has that material dimension, and that to ignore it is wrong. But I believe that they also have a dignity, that mankind is superior to the animal kingdom, intellectually, morally, their use of rational faculties, their use of self-interest, and their capacity for problem solving. But fundamentally, as moral beings, mankind is capable of doing right or wrong and is accountable for doing right or wrong. This ends up inviting non-material dimension into economic wellbeing.

And so because I believe work is the verb of economics, is a line I use at the end of the book, I reject the Marxian notion that work is dehumanising. I think work is dignifying. But why do I care if mankind is dignified or not, let alone if work as an instrument for doing such? Well, I care because I view mankind as created in the image of God. And that’s a religious belief. That’s a theological belief. And if I didn’t believe that, I would believe something different about economics. And so my rejection of a Darwinian view of economics, my embrace of a Burkean notion that there is a moral dimension to how we cooperate in society, these things are rooted in some of these worldview assumptions that I don’t know how I can escape their religious nature.

Gene Tunny  11:40

Okay. Yeah.  Burke, you mean Edmund Burke, the Anglo Irish statesman from the late 19th century?

David Bahnsen  11:50

That’s right. I guess sometimes doing American interviews I take for granted, because I consider Burke America’s foremost political philosopher, but of course globally, his name and reputation would maybe have a different context. But Burke, really known, much like Adam Smith as the Scotsman was a sort of religious or moral philosopher with great economic relevance in classical economics, and Burke was a political philosopher, but again, who brought a sort of moral dimension to his work.

Gene Tunny  12:25

Yes. I’ve been reading this great book, The Great Debate by Yuval Levine or Levin. I’m trying to remember. I might put a link in the show notes as well as links to your books, because Burke, he was involved in that great debate about what’s the goal of politic or what’s the best way to run society, and you don’t want to go and radically transform things, because there might be a reason that your institutions are the way they are in the first place. And so you have to be very careful with meddling.

I just want to chat more about this fallen nature idea. Is this related to the concept of self-interest? The great thing about the market is that it takes advantage of people’s self-interest. There’s a famous quote of Adam Smith, about how we rely on the baker for our meals and on the candlestick maker for the candles, not out of any social concern they have, but out of their concern for their self-interest. I think I’ve butchered that quite. But that’s the basic idea. Is that the idea, so it’s taking advantage of that and getting the incentives right? And if you’re in, say, what you had in the Soviet Union, then all those incentives are the wrong way. To get something for yourself, you don’t necessarily have to create value for another person. And that’s the great thing about the market. It’s that mutual exchange, that you’re creating value for the other person, for them to pay you. That’s roughly on the right track, is it?

David Bahnsen  14:12

Well, I think those things are all very consistent with the assumption, but one of the things that I’m doing from the worldview I’m speaking, which is different than the way Ayn Rand as an objectivist would approach it, and in fact, many secular economists. Secular economists would describe it descriptively, that descriptively one can do better for themselves by serving their customer better. And Adam Smith’s allusion to reference to that self-interest is what they’re referencing. And it’s almost indisputable. It’s the way the world works.

But what I’m adding is the prescriptive, not merely the descriptive, not just that you will do better by serving your neighbour better, but that you ought to serve your neighbour better, and that in so doing, we cultivate more trust in society. Commercial transactions are entirely dependent on trust. And so they’re not merely in micro transactions like the brewer or baker a candlestick maker with a customer. But on a macro level, the greater sense of moral sentiment in the society, which, of course, was Adam Smith’s other book, we couple these two coexisting realities of human nature together, which is mankind rationally working in their own self-interest, providing for their family, and at the same time, their need and requirement to have that sort of moral capacity of service. And so I think that Burke referred to this as enlightened self-interest. And I believe it is the ideal for what I’m after in a framework of economics.

There’s no question that, whether one accepts my religious assumptions or not, that the free market properly aligns incentives better than the Marxist or central planning, collectivist vision for society that strips away incentives, and does not provide the framework for best serving a customer by meeting human needs, providing goods or services that we believe people care about. But I do believe one can make an argument – and I think that this is the straw man that a lot of socialists today are arguing against – that if you don’t care about the moral wellbeing of society in your economic worldview, and that all you’re saying is that pragmatically your wellbeing will be best served the more you serve your neighbour, all we have to do is find a case where that isn’t true, and it would be okay. And most certainly, it sometimes isn’t true, because as long as you can get away with it, cooking the books can help you and hurt your neighbour. And again, you have to be able to get away with it. But a lot of people can get away with fraud, a lot of people can get away with theft.

This Darwinian view that is more driven by the best outcome for oneself, and only relies on serving others as a mere pragmatic supplemental convenience to the process, I think it falls apart in reality, because we apart from that framework that still honours service to others, then one loses the kind of holistic nature that has been the traditional case for free markets. And I would argue more or less that the outcome, that when we look at the great fruits of poverty alleviation and human flourishing that’s come out of free markets, we have never been in need of divorcing that from a moral framework. In fact, it requires a moral and a legal framework, rule of law, enforcement or private property. These are all concepts that have roots in the very 10 commandments of themselves. Coveting what someone else has is sort of the heart of Marxism. And believing in protection of private property is the heart of what we call capitalism. And yet those are moral commandments. Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not covet.  

I think that that synthesis between the moral nature of markets and the aspirational vision of society and the self-interest that Adam Smith talks about are entirely consistent, and in fact, not only consistent, but they’re optimised. They work best in conjunction with one another. They each work with one hand tied behind their back apart from the other.

Gene Tunny  19:22

That’s great, David. It’s given me a lot to think about, because maybe I’ve approached economics too much as a technical field, and I need to think more about the philosophy. I really value your thoughts in helping me think more philosophically about it, so that’s great. Okay, we’ll take a short break here for a word from our sponsor.

Female speaker  19:55

If you need to crunch the numbers, then get in touch with Adept Economics. We offer you frank and fearless economic analysis and advice. We can help you with funding submissions, cost-benefit analysis studies, and economic modelling of all sorts. Our head office is in Brisbane, Australia, but we work all over the world. You can get in touch via our website, http://www.adepteconomics.com.au. We’d love to hear from you.

Gene Tunny  20:24

Now back to the show. I might move on to your book about Elizabeth Warren. I guess this follows on from some of the points you’ve made. Now, you’ve written that her presidency would destroy the middle class and the American dream. She’s not president, but there’s some of those ideas, they’re out there, and they could be picked up in the future, whether by maybe AOC one day if she ends up very senior position, in a position of power.

One thing that I’m wondering is, how do you think about the balance between market and state? There needs to be some role for government. And there are countries that seem to be doing relatively well with a more interventionist state, such as the Scandinavian countries, Australia to an extent. One major difference between Australia and the United States is that we have what you would call a single-payer health care system. And that is reasonably popular. Well, I think it’s very popular. No opposition party, nowadays they would no longer campaign against it. Once upon a time they did. Political parties would campaign against it. It’s widely accepted. How do you make that balance? And what do you think is so bad about policies just to inject a little bit of what you might call socialism into the system to try and make the political system more stable? How do you think about that?

David Bahnsen  22:02

I haven’t seen an example yet of where a little bit of socialism brings more stability to the political system. I don’t recall there being anything in my Elizabeth Warren book that I would take back or rewrite or don’t still believe. But I confess, it strikes me as a little less relevant because of the implosion of her candidacy, as it pertains to her. But as you say, people like AOC, Bernie Sanders, they’re meeting hard left figures in many other countries besides my own. She just happened to be a failed political candidate that I wrote a book about that became obsolete very quickly, because her candidacy imploded. But there does still seem to be some persistence in the idea of a Green New Deal, a wealth tax, forgiveness of student debt for all. And to the extent these ideas persist in the United States, or in other countries, they remain horrifically bad ideas, even if they’re not connected to the name of Elizabeth Warren anymore.

Now, with that said, when you ask why not just a little bit of socialism to come in and kind of maybe temper things a bit, we hear that expression a lot, to sort of smooth out the rough edges of capitalism. And I love the analogy, because it always sort of implies that capitalism is like a bowl of soup, and it can get a little bit too hot, and if you just add a little cool water on top – and that cool water, in this case, is the loving, all-competent arm of the federal government – then we can cool down the soup a little bit, still get a good warm bowl, and enjoy it and have it feed our appetite, but not scalding hot, burn our mouths. And of course, frameworks of thought and of governance and political and economic philosophies don’t work like a bowl of soup.

I am a Hayekian to the core. Friedrich Hayek told us why that can’t work, that the central planner, whether they’re coming in to do a lot, or whatever it is, a little – I would, by the way, debate the idea that they are ever content to do a little. But even apart from the very reality of slippery slope, there is the knowledge problem. And there is the incentive problem.

The reason why I cannot ask Washington DC to come in and smooth out transactions between me and another economic actor that would freely transact with me in business is that the government has no chance of having the knowledge and the time and place circumstances necessary to be a party in a transaction between me and another person. And the reason why I can’t ask the government to come in and smooth out the rough edges of two free human beings voluntarily transacting with one another is because the government can’t possibly have the incentives. They don’t have skin in the game. They don’t hurt economically if it goes poorly, and they don’t benefit economically if it goes well. It’s none of their damn business.

The government’s intervention on a macro level into the affairs of society must always be limited to its role in protection of private property, settlement of civil disputes, this very rare but nevertheless important function of a civil magistrate. The Warrens and Sanderses and AOCs of the world would have the government take on a role of a central planner. And the Keynesian vision of economics is that the government can play a role on a macro basis in smoothing the difficulties of a business cycle. But of course, my belief is that such interventions not only likely don’t solve the problem they seek to solve, but they inevitably create two new problems. And so the reason for rejection of that vision of government’s role in economic affairs is that I believe that government lacks the knowledge to transact or to have planning jurisdiction over transactions in a free economy.

Gene Tunny  26:36

Fair point. And, yeah, the whole slippery slope thing, potentially there is there is some sort of slippery slope, because the government just keeps ever expanding. And one of the problems we’ve got here in Australia now is that the government’s committed to having what we call a national disability insurance scheme, which is essentially trying to provide a level of care for disabled people, but the definition of that’s expanded a lot and the costs are blowing out. It’s a big challenge. You still got a little bit more time, David, or you got to –

David Bahnsen  27:08

Yeah, I’m okay. Go ahead.

Gene Tunny  27:09

Good one. Excellent. I’d like to ask, you’re also a host of a podcast, Radio Free California, is that right?

David Bahnsen  27:19

That’s one of my podcasts, yes.

Gene Tunny  27:23

Oh, you’ve got another. Great.

David Bahnsen  27:25

Capital Record is my podcast focused on free market, economics, defence of free enterprise, defence of capital markets. And I host. It’s a National Review podcast called Capitol Record. But Radio Free California is a more political podcast that focuses on the dysfunctions in the great state of California where I was born and raised and have lived most of the last 48 years.

Gene Tunny  27:53

Yeah. Could I ask, what’s your take on, just how bad are things in California for business at the moment?  I’ve chatted about this with Dan Mitchell. And Dan pointed out just how many people and businesses are leaving. Is this something that you’ve thought about, or are you concerned about the policy settings for business in California?

David Bahnsen  28:16

Of course I’m concerned. Anybody who cares about the preservation of one of the largest economic bodies in the world, and obviously the largest economic body within the United States, should be concerned. I hear a lot from the political and economic left that they care about the middle class. Yet it sure seems that they are perfectly happy with a policy framework that hollows out the middle class. And a state like California is case in point, where very wealthy people can live in California quite comfortably, and very poor people might be fans of the welfare state or what have you, but there is a kind of middle ground by which policies, school systems, crime becomes very, very unpleasant. And California seems to me to be ground zero for this laboratory of America, what we call blue state policies. And that’s what our efforts are primarily focused on is exposing the folly of blue state policies. And then as Dan Mitchell and others have well documented, it is leading to an incredible migration of mostly middle-class people out of the state of California to go to more business-friendly environments. And I think it’s a tragedy.

Gene Tunny  29:53

One of your other books is Crisis of Responsibility: Our Cultural Addiction to Blame and How You Can Cure It. Now, what I found great about that book is you had a really interesting take on the financial crisis. I knew the basic facts, but I hadn’t thought about it in that way. But you argued that there was a failure of moral responsibility in a way, when people were simply walking away from houses where they had negative equity, which I found a really interesting take. And am I getting that right? Am I remembering that correctly?

David Bahnsen  30:39

You’re absolutely getting that right. And that, I would argue, was one of many moral failings in the financial crisis. But it was conveniently the one that was entirely ignored in the narrative. Ultimately, the desire for many of us on the right to put blame with the government, with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the Federal Reserve, we were willing to look past Main Street’s faults, and the desire of those on the left to blame greed of Wall Street, of the banks, various familiar bad guys in their societal narrative, they were willing to look past the iniquities of Main Street. And I think it was entirely absurd set of stories told us about the financial crisis that chose to ignore Main Street’s culpability. And you reference those with negative equity. There’s simply no question that in the end, the pile on of foreclosures, and what really represented this purging of bad investment, that then had the domino effect into the overly levered credit and financial system. What the initial dominoes were to tipping that over-levered credit system over was the fact that people stopped making house payments when they were upside down on their houses.

And so although I would argue the very first act of moral culpability that led to the crisis was people’s Keeping Up with the Joneses mentality, and irresponsibility, and taking on a commitment they couldn’t keep, the lack of necessary protective equity in their home, dishonesty about their own income documentation. There are a whole lot of things that went into this game that was being played, that many people played well for a lot of years, until the music stopped playing. And when the music stopped playing, this house of cards fell.

And my book was attempting to say, I know what Wall Street did wrong, and I know what the government did wrong. But it is simply untrue that Main Street did nothing wrong, and in fact, that Main Street is a victim of this whole thing. That’s the way the story was being told. And I feel like five years later, my book has done a good job in telling the story that needed to be told about the financial crisis.

Gene Tunny  33:25

What do you see as the solution? Is there a solution? I think you’re right, in that there is a problem that that people are reluctant to take responsibility. I think you’ve you have diagnosed a problem. How do we solve this, David? Is there a solution to it?

David Bahnsen  33:49

Well, I think that the book goes into a whole lot of ideas. If I remember correctly, 10 of them are written to the individual person and sort of micro suggestions for a reaffirmation of personal responsibility, and 10 or macro, more of a policy level. I have a critique of the college student loan system, a critique of how we go about thinking about housing in our society.

Fundamentally, if you’ll allow me to go back to the kind of prior conversation about the religious and moral framework of a society, if people can get away with irresponsibly borrowing to buy a home and then walking away unscathed, if people get away with it without any moral compass, I don’t know why they wouldn’t keep doing it. But my belief is that fundamentally, we need a kind of restoration of basic cultural norms. This was really the whole point of the book, that people should be ashamed of what they did, but it isn’t just that they did it. It’s that they were proud of it, that other people congratulated them. Look how smart you are. You pulled one over on your bank. They could brag about it on Friday night with their friends, rather than being ashamed of the fact that they failed in their responsibility.

Paying back debts that one owes is the hallmark of a civilised person. And I think that we desperately need to restore the kind of traditional value system that would never tolerate someone being a degenerate and being so incapable of basic… I’m not referring to people in extreme hardship. We’ve always had that. We always want ways to help those who have genuinely run into very difficult times. But the notion of just simply being able to run away willy-nilly from things, heads, I win, tails, I don’t lose, this is no way to manage a society.

Gene Tunny  36:04

That’s another great example of a book where you’re thinking… Maybe economists wouldn’t normally think about these issues. I’d recommend that as well. Also, you’ve got a book on the case for dividend growth, and this relates to your investing. And I’ve just started that, but the way I’m interpreting it is you’re emphasising look for stocks with good dividends and don’t necessarily buy into all of the fantasies about you’ve got these stocks which will just grow ridiculous amounts in the future, the big tech stocks. I take it that that’s the general view in that book. Is that fair, David? Is that your philosophy in investing is looking for good earning stocks, good earning companies?

David Bahnsen  36:59

Well, dividends are simply what one is doing with good earnings. There are plenty of companies that don’t pay dividends that have wonderful earnings. But our belief is that not only do you want really good earnings, you want confirmation of the earnings, the legitimacy of them and the repeatability of them, and the growth of them, that is validated through the dividend payment to the shareholder. The dividend payment becomes a mechanical benefit. You’re monetizing your investment risk as you go. If you’re reinvesting those dividends, you’re constantly averaging and compounding your return. If you’re withdrawing the dividend for income, you’re satisfying a cash flow need, so that there are mechanical benefits to dividends. But then fundamentally, they represent proof of the profits and earnings of the company, and a vote from management in their own confidence about the sustainability of those earnings. And so dividends are just as much a benefit as they are a signal. And we want both and. That’s our view of dividend growth investing from a risk-adjusted standpoint, producing a much smoother result for investors over time.

Gene Tunny  38:22

Good stuff. Finally, David, I’d like to ask you about Alex P. Keaton, who you’ve identified as a role model. I remember watching Family Ties in the ‘80s here in Australia, and Alex was certainly someone who was very notable. What was it that you found inspirational, or I guess what did you learn from Alex? What are your thoughts on –

David Bahnsen  38:58

Just as a very young kid, I… Here there was this contrarian character on a sitcom on American television that was focused on ambition, on goals, on patriotism. He had a certain love of America, a love of self-determination. And so there was a lot of comedy associated with it and lightheartedness. And yet, at the same time, he was a character who just sort of had a personality that was similar to my own quirky personality as a young person. It’s many years ago now. It’s true, Alex P. Keaton and that character on Family Ties was a big part of my childhood.

Gene Tunny  39:53

Okay. Very good. Yeah. I think there’s a photo of you on your website as a young lad. You’re dressed as Alex P. Keaton or dressed in that –

David Bahnsen  40:04

This is true. I think I was probably nine or 10 years old. That’s correct.

Gene Tunny  40:09

Very good. Okay, excellent. David, this has been terrific. Are there any final points that you’d like to make, any thoughts on your book? Anything that you think it’d be important for us to take out of it?

David Bahnsen  40:24

I appreciate the time. I appreciate your thoughtful questions. There’s No Free Lunch: 250 Economic Truths, and it’s really intended to give people a little something to think about around the different major categories of economic thought.

Gene Tunny  40:38

Okay, thanks heaps, David, I’ll put links to your website and your books in the show notes. David Bahnsen, managing partner of the Bahnsen Group. Thanks so much for your time. Really appreciate it.

David Bahnsen  40:52

Thanks for having me, Gene. Really enjoyed it.

Gene Tunny  40:55 Okay, that’s the end of this episode of Economics Explored. I hope you enjoyed it. If so, please tell your family and friends and leave a comment or give us a rating on your podcast app. If you have any comments, questions, suggestions, you can feel free to send them to contact@economicsexplored.com and we’ll aim to address them in a future episode. Thanks for listening. Until next week, goodbye.

Credits

Big thanks to EP132 guest David Bahnsen and to the show’s audio engineer Josh Crotts for his assistance in producing the episode. 

Please get in touch with any questions, comments and suggestions by emailing us at contact@economicsexplored.com or sending a voice message via https://www.speakpipe.com/economicsexplored. Economics Explored is available via Apple Podcasts

Categories
Podcast episode

EP87 – Saving & investing for retirement: 401(k)s, IRAs, mutual funds, ETFs, etc

In Episode 87 of Economics Explored, host Gene Tunny discusses saving and investing for retirement with Sarah Holden, Senior Director of Retirement & Investor Research at the Investment Company Institute (ICI). ICI is the leading association representing regulated funds globally, including US mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Sarah has a Ph.D. in economics and has studied retirement trends and policy, as well as the behavior of investors, for decades. She uses humor and plain English to make retirement and investment concepts clear. Sarah is based in Washington, DC and Gene spoke with her over Zoom on 12 May 2021. 

Links relevant to the conversation include:

ICI Education Foundation (ICIEF)

ICI webpage on 401(k)s

ICI webpage on IRA

Get on the road to investing

A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing

Australia vs US: A scorecard on the Australian and US Defined Contribution Systems

Please send through any questions, comments or suggestions to contact@economicsexplored.com and Gene will aim to address them in a future episode.

Exit mobile version